Page 31 of 31 FirstFirst ... 212728293031
Results 1,201 to 1,234 of 1234

Thread: Interesting articles thread

  1. #1201
    growing cakes on some ropes Vex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Bakery
    Posts
    392
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)




    BORN TO TYPE
    WORLD IS A SOCIONIKA
    心理学 Type Em All 1991
    I am jung fan

    410,757,864,530 PEOPLE TYPED




  2. #1202
    Ксеркс, царь царей xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Miniluv
    Posts
    7,224
    Mentioned
    166 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Singu View Post
    Why is it okay for the police to loathe the citizens, but not when it's the other way around? There's something clearly wrong with the people who want to maintain the status quo of the police abusing innocent people.

    If the police hold more power and responsibility over people, then clearly the police hold more accountability. If the police can't handle a little heat, then get the fuck out and quit being a cop. The police has a monopoly on violence, so that's to be expected. If the police can't control themselves (or we can't control the police), then the society is doomed and it becomes a police state.
    Of course it's not OK, but that's not the point. The point is that they're not going to "fuck off" just because you said so. All you're doing is greasing the wheels of the right wing political machine, which will invariably paint liberals as "pro-crime". No amount of sympathy will convince terrified suburbanites or small-business owners to support your cause. What business owner is going to be indifferent to being burgled?

    Policemen may have an in-group bias, but it's not this absurd in more peaceful countries — countries which are peaceful to begin with because they don't have a culture of incendiary or melodramatic political rhetoric.
    Last edited by xerx; 04-08-2021 at 06:52 PM. Reason: added

  3. #1203

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    3,605
    Mentioned
    264 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xerxe View Post
    Of course it's not OK, but that's not the point. The point is that they're not going to "fuck off" just because you said so. All you're doing is greasing the wheels of the right wing political machine, which will invariably paint liberals as "pro-crime". No amount of sympathy will convince terrified suburbanites or small-business owners to support your cause. What business owner is going to be indifferent to being burgled?

    Policemen may have an in-group, but it's not this absurd in more peaceful countries — countries which are peaceful to begin with because they don't have a culture of incendiary or melodramatic political rhetoric.
    Sorry, I got a little mad there. It appears that the police in US work almost exactly the opposite of how the police in most other developed countries work. The job of the police is to de-escalate the violence in a situation, not escalate it. The job of the police isn't to just go out there and "kick ass" of the "bad guys". If they increase the violence, then it will be a net negative to the society as a whole, which defeats the whole purpose of having a police.

    But that's exactly what the American police are doing. They will taunt you just enough so that you will retaliate and have an excuse to beat you up and arrest you. They will use way more force than necessarily, and may even shoot you or kill you. In most countries, the police will first try to calm you down. Of course, they will use force when necessary and make arrests, but again the point is to de-escalate. If the police are escalating violence, then they're just making the situation worse, which is why people are critical of the police in America. They're just making things worse by the mere fact of existing. They're not protecting people from violence, but they themselves are creating even more violence.

    I'd suppose that's why in pop-culture (and perhaps in real life too), the police in US are often "trash talking" and generally intimidate the citizens into submission. But that's exactly how the cops shouldn't behave.

    Unfortunately, most Americans are brainwashed into thinking (or perhaps simply don't know any better) that this is normal, that this is how cops should behave. They think that it's normal when cops are trigger-happy and just shoot everyone on sight. In most countries it's simply rare that cops even shoot guns at all. I believe most people in America don't actually feel protected by the police. And if the right-wing think that this is normal, then it simply means that they're deluded. Not even the right-wing and conservatives outside of America would agree with them. The police in America are simply insane and have an insane culture. I don't believe that this should be negotiated for political reasons.

    And you know what, people have been complaining about "police brutality" for decades, but nothing seems to change. It appears that the entire cop culture in the US needs to change. And even how people think cops should behave.

  4. #1204
    Ксеркс, царь царей xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Miniluv
    Posts
    7,224
    Mentioned
    166 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Singu View Post
    Sorry, I got a little mad there. It appears that the police in US work almost exactly the opposite of how the police in most other developed countries work. The job of the police is to de-escalate the violence in a situation, not escalate it. The job of the police isn't to just go out there and "kick ass" of the "bad guys". If they increase the violence, then it will be a net negative to the society as a whole, which defeats the whole purpose of having a police.

    But that's exactly what the American police are doing. They will taunt you just enough so that you will retaliate and have an excuse to beat you up and arrest you. They will use way more force than necessarily, and may even shoot you or kill you. In most countries, the police will first try to calm you down. Of course, they will use force when necessary and make arrests, but again the point is to de-escalate. If the police are escalating violence, then they're just making the situation worse, which is why people are critical of the police in America. They're just making things worse by the mere fact of existing. They're not protecting people from violence, but they themselves are creating even more violence.

    I'd suppose that's why in pop-culture (and perhaps in real life too), the police in US are often "trash talking" and generally intimidate the citizens into submission. But that's exactly how the cops shouldn't behave.

    Unfortunately, most Americans are brainwashed into thinking (or perhaps simply don't know any better) that this is normal, that this is how cops should behave. They think that it's normal when cops are trigger-happy and just shoot everyone on sight. In most countries it's simply rare that cops even shoot guns at all. I believe most people in America don't actually feel protected by the police. And if the right-wing think that this is normal, then it simply means that they're deluded. Not even the right-wing and conservatives outside of America would agree with them. The police in America are simply insane and have an insane culture. I don't believe that this should be negotiated for political reasons.

    And you know what, people have been complaining about "police brutality" for decades, but nothing seems to change. It appears that the entire cop culture in the US needs to change. And even how people think cops should behave.

    My suggestion for the American left is to change their choice of rhetoric. The correct objective is to fund the police, not to defund them.

    They need more money, not less, to retrain their officers to use less lethal force; to buy body cameras; to hire professional psychologists to assess violent officers; and to create community outreach programs that tackle the real roots of crime, which include mental illness, drug addiction, and poverty.

    The last point is crucial. The logical justification for the slogan "defund the police" is to transfer the money to civilian-led initiatives that tackle the institutional causes of criminal behaviour. But there's no reason why police officers shouldn't directly participate in this effort. If the goal is to transition the police into a paternal rather than paternalistic role, then it would be logical to integrate these programs into the police's core constitution.

    And that may well be the goal of lefties who shout these divisive slogans. But that's obviously not what's conveyed when messages like this, which are easy to take out of context, are taken out of context.

  5. #1205

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    3,605
    Mentioned
    264 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xerxe View Post
    My suggestion for the American left is to change their choice of rhetoric. The correct objective is to fund the police, not to defund them.

    They need more money, not less, to retrain their officers to use less lethal force; to buy body cameras; to hire professional psychologists to assess violent officers; and to create community outreach programs that tackle the real roots of crime, which include mental illness, drug addiction, and poverty.

    The last point is crucial. The logical justification for the slogan "defund the police" is to transfer the money to civilian-led initiatives that tackle the institutional causes of criminal behaviour. But there's no reason why police officers shouldn't directly participate in this effort. If the goal is to transition the police into a paternal rather than paternalistic role, then it would be logical to integrate these programs into the police's core constitution.

    And that may well be the goal of lefties who shout these divisive slogans. But that's obviously not what's conveyed when messages like this, which are easy to take out of context, are taken out of context.
    I think the police is funded enough already, with $6 billion budget spent on NYPD alone, and $1 trillion spent on War on Drugs over 4 decades. To be sure, they do require redirecting of those funds.

    The culprit is probably the disastrous "War on Drugs" policy, which appears to have militarized the police and elevated the status of the police by giving them qualified immunity and extraordinary rights that go far and above what they really require, which has only made them less transparent and hence less accountable and liable for human rights violations that they commit.

    Here's a conservative's opinion piece on "defund the police":

    Don't defund the police. Defund the war on drugs. Let cops be officers of the peace.

    For us who live in the suburbs or rural areas, the police remain the protectors of our life, liberty, and property. They come to our homes when alarms go off, injuries occur, or crimes perpetrated. We are grateful for their presence and actions.

    In the inner city, however, the police and the citizens have a very different relationship. Many residents resent and fear the police. And on the other side, the police frequently take their lives in their hands, responding to urban disturbances and crimes. Just a few generations ago, the city beat cops were the neighborhood's welcomed protectors, just as they still are in my Spring Garden Township community. What went wrong?

    Part of the answer is that the inner-city police have become less the defenders of the individual's life, liberty, and property – officers of the peace – and more the state's law enforcement agents. First and foremost, the police have become the state's force to prosecute the drug war.

    And yet, after spending $1 trillion over the four decades on the War on Drugs, there has been no measurable decrease in drug use, addiction, or overdose rates, and the land of the free and the brave now houses 25% of the world's incarcerated.

    The drug war has spawned many policies infringing on our constitutionally protected individual freedoms.

    The officers of the peace of old carried nightsticks and revolvers. Many urban police forces now have military hardware, including armored vehicles with mounted machine guns, grenade launchers, assault rifles, and night vision goggles.

    In many cities, police have citation quotas to meet municipal financial goals, particularly harassing and burdening the poorest.

    Police unions have negotiated contracts giving officers suspected of wrongdoing, rights above and beyond those afforded to ordinary citizens, making the investigation of alleged misconduct more difficult. "Qualified immunity" shields police from personal liability unless a previous court has found in a prior case involving the same facts in the same jurisdiction that a law enforcement officer had violated an individual's rights.

    Wherever you may lie on the law and order spectrum, I contend that most, including our police officers, would prefer "Protect and Serve" as the primary mission of urban policing to the inherent conflict of law enforcement. But how to restore that mission?

    Eliminating qualified immunity and other extraordinary rights for police suspected of wrongdoing, no-knock warrants, civil asset forfeiture, military weaponry for community police departments, and quota systems for tickets, revenues, and arrests would be appropriate and relatively uncontroversial.

    Inner-city policing no longer manifests our country's foundational vision of government established to protect our "Life, Liberty, and Happiness." The immediate cause, the War on Drugs, is a symptom of a more profound and fundamental illness; nonetheless, decriminalizing narcotic abuse would end the worst of the violence and individual rights violations of the drug war. The cure ultimately lies in welfare reform, school choice, a vibrant private economy, and recovery of traditional American values. Once again, inner-city police could be the officers of the peace.

  6. #1206
    Ксеркс, царь царей xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Miniluv
    Posts
    7,224
    Mentioned
    166 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Singu View Post
    I think the police is funded enough already, with $6 billion budget spent on NYPD alone, and $1 trillion spent on War on Drugs over 4 decades. To be sure, they do require redirecting of those funds.

    The culprit is probably the disastrous "War on Drugs" policy, which appears to have militarized the police and elevated the status of the police by giving them qualified immunity and extraordinary rights that go far and above what they really require, which has only made them less transparent and hence less accountable and liable for human rights violations that they commit.
    Maybe. I'd need to think about it.

  7. #1207
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    12,468
    Mentioned
    1255 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    The Meteoric Rise and Dramatic Fall of a Salesman:

    https://medium.com/truly-adventurous...n-872a98f9c98e

    What type do you believe this person is? I have my own opinion but I'm interested in other people's thoughts.

  8. #1208
    thistle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2021
    Posts
    353
    Mentioned
    28 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default


  9. #1209

  10. #1210

  11. #1211

  12. #1212
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    12,468
    Mentioned
    1255 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

  13. #1213

    Default

    Resolving the emergence-reduction debate

    https://link.springer.com/article/10...229-006-9020-5

  14. #1214
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    12,468
    Mentioned
    1255 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kalinoche buenanoche View Post
    Resolving the emergence-reduction debate

    https://link.springer.com/article/10...229-006-9020-5
    @Kalinoche buenanoche, that article is behind a paywall, but it seems to be talking about ways of understanding the Universe. I'm agnostic about this, myself.

    A very readable book that talks obliquely about reductionism vs emergence is A Different Universe, by Robert Laughlin. I think he's LII and he's definitely conservative, but he's an entertaining writer.

    https://www.amazon.com/Different-Uni.../dp/0465038298

  15. #1215
    Ксеркс, царь царей xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Miniluv
    Posts
    7,224
    Mentioned
    166 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

  16. #1216

  17. #1217

  18. #1218
    Enlightened Hedonist Subteigh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    17,576
    Mentioned
    382 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    The Evolutionary Biology of Religious Behavior

    Fieder, M. and Huber, S., 2021. The Evolutionary Biology of Religious Behavior. Interdisciplinary Journal for Religion and Transformation in Contemporary Society, 7(1), pp.303-334.

    10.30965/23642807-bja10014

    Abstract

    In the following review article, we aim to summarize the current research progress in the field of evolutionary and behavior genetics studies on human religiousness and religious behavior. First, we provide a brief (and thus incomplete) overview of the historical discussions and explain the genetic basis of behavior in general and religious behavior in particular, from twin studies to molecular data analysis. In the second part of the paper, we discuss the potential evolutionary forces leading to human religiousness and human religious behavior, emphasizing the emergence of “axial age” and the so called “big gods” in the relatively recent history of humans.

  19. #1219
    Ксеркс, царь царей xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Miniluv
    Posts
    7,224
    Mentioned
    166 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    A concise article RE. the nation-building failure in Afghanistan.

    https://www.economist.com/internatio...-client-states

    Such corruption creates patronage networks that threaten the state’s integrity. Officials’ main goal is not carrying out their agency’s mission, but extorting revenue to distribute to their families and cronies. Even before America invaded, Afghanistan was partly run by patronage networks headed by regional warlords.

    Yet instead of dismantling these networks, America strengthened them by paying warlords to keep the peace, according to reports by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR), an American oversight authority. Afghans soon grew furious at government corruption and more welcoming towards the Taliban. A study in 2015 by Transparency International cited one policymaker’s epiphany: “The guys at the bottom are sending money to the top of the system and the guys at the top are sending protection downwards, which is how a mafia runs.”

    ...


    But under subsequent commanders the Shafafiyat was cut back. By the time of the Taliban’s final offensive the state had grown so corrupt that most of its governors cut deals with the jihadists to switch sides. The Afghan army was in poor shape to fight: its numbers were inflated by “ghost soldiers”—absentees listed on the payroll so that commanders could steal their salaries.

    The government of Afghanistan was corrupt to the hilt. It was hard for individuals to order legal affairs without bribing officials, creating enough disillusionment for many locals to actively support the Taliban. Since money was siphoned off by members of government, Afghan soldiers were underpayed and too underequipped to fight. On top of that, in its effort to enlist allies (without whose support it would have been impossible to govern), it was the United States that sponsored the patronage networks responsible for the corruption.

    As for the economic angle, spending vast sums of money to stabilize a country like Afghanistan causes inflation, which causes further corruption.

    This leads to a related problem: spending too much money in poor countries causes corruption. In both South Vietnam and Afghanistan, a vast influx of American dollars caused a surge in inflation, wiping out public-sector salaries. (Afghanistan, with a GDP of about $20bn in 2020, received $145bn in American aid between 2001 and 2021. Inflation averaged 17.5% in 2003-08.) Neither government had the capacity to collect enough taxes for the wages of soldiers and civil servants to keep pace. Even otherwise honest public servants were forced to demand kickbacks to support themselves.
    Last edited by xerx; 08-23-2021 at 08:47 AM.

  20. #1220
    Ксеркс, царь царей xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Miniluv
    Posts
    7,224
    Mentioned
    166 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    A former Indian diplomat (who has served all over Asia, including Afghanistan, and knows the country very well) shares some optimistic insights about the Taliban's takeover.

    Russia, China, and Iran, along with the rest of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization want to trade, and they have a vested interest in a stable Afghanistan (Iran has already resumed its oil exports to Afghanistan). This, in turn, as the Taliban are no doubt aware, requires a government that's inclusive of the varying factions and minorities. The Taliban are not isolationists; they will be looking to trade and acquire international legitimacy. link

    Here, he makes the case for the Taliban's pragmatism — the Taliban prefer to avoid military actions except as a last resort, and may choose to negotiate rather than attack the Panjshir holdout. link

    Here, he makes the case that the Taliban have moderated their old stances, and that their initial statements concerning human rights aren't a deception. link

    It's worth noting that the old Taliban was heavily financed by Gulf-Arab millionaires, whose support was contingent on the Taliban's acceptance of a deeply reactionary form of Islam. Now that the Taliban are supported by Russia and China, they have a freer hand to select an Islam that's politically expedient.


    I'll wait to see whether this optimism is justified, but it's nice to hear an opinion about the situation that's not entirely dour.

  21. #1221
    Ксеркс, царь царей xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Miniluv
    Posts
    7,224
    Mentioned
    166 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    https://www.kansascity.com/opinion/r...253641358.html

    The truth is that the Afghan National Security Forces was a jobs program for Afghans, propped up by U.S. taxpayer dollars — a military jobs program populated by nonmilitary people or “paper” forces (that didn’t really exist) and a bevy of elites grabbing what they could when they could.
    I was delighted to see how far along they were on paper — until I actually began working with them. I attempted to adjust the charts to reflect reality and was quickly shut down. The ratings could not go down. That was the deal. It was the kind of lie that kept the war going.

  22. #1222
    The Evening and the Morning Star Eudaimonia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    EIE-D 3w4 Sx/So
    Posts
    2,123
    Mentioned
    98 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    https://www.discovermagazine.com/health/is-it-time-to-rethink-food-coloring?utm_source=pocket-newtab


    Is It Time to Rethink Food Coloring?

    The FDA says they’re safe in moderation. But some experts say their guidelines are outdated and need changes to account for the possibility that dyes affect children's brains and behavior.


    With mind distracted, never thinking, "Death is coming,"
    To slave away on the pointless business of mundane life,
    And then to come out empty--it is a tragic error.
    ENFJ | EIE | WEPL | 3w4 sx/so

  23. #1223
    Ксеркс, царь царей xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Miniluv
    Posts
    7,224
    Mentioned
    166 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Super stoked about this, hope it happens: https://asiatimes.com/2021/08/china-...rbit-starship/

  24. #1224
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    12,468
    Mentioned
    1255 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    ILE & SEI build a house and a family:

    https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/ar...=pocket-newtab

    .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. ............
    .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. ............


    Have an SLI son, then kids sell property to Gamma.
    Last edited by Adam Strange; 08-31-2021 at 01:33 PM.

  25. #1225

    Default

    @Adam Strange or daughter?

  26. #1226
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    12,468
    Mentioned
    1255 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kalinoche buenanoche View Post
    @Adam Strange or daughter?
    Kali, the author of the article was named Thad, so I assume he’s their son. He writes like an SLI thinks.
    I assume that the children of the ILE-SEI sold the place to Gammas, because it was converted into something efficient and marketable.

    I’m not sure I understand your “daughter” question.

    Oh, wait. I get it.
    That should read “They have an SLI son.”

    Daughters are great, and the couple had them, too, but the son wrote the article.

  27. #1227
    ⊱⋆⊰Cookie Monster⊱⋆⊰ reverie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    child of the corn
    TIM
    the SEI-ish ESI 296
    Posts
    2,585
    Mentioned
    485 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ·:*¨༺༻¨*:·.𝓽𝓾𝓶𝓫𝓵𝓻·:*¨༺ ༻¨*:·.
    քɨռȶɛʀɛֆȶ
    ♓︎ 𝓅𝒾𝓈𝒸𝑒𝓈 ♓︎ 𝓅𝒾𝓈𝒸𝑒𝓈
    ♍︎ 𝓋𝒾𝓇𝑔𝑜 𝓇𝒾𝓈𝒾𝓃𝑔 ♍︎

  28. #1228
    The Evening and the Morning Star Eudaimonia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    EIE-D 3w4 Sx/So
    Posts
    2,123
    Mentioned
    98 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    https://hbr.org/2017/01/the-downside...ly-intelligent


    The Downsides of Being Very Emotionally Intelligent
    tfw too emotionally intelligent
    With mind distracted, never thinking, "Death is coming,"
    To slave away on the pointless business of mundane life,
    And then to come out empty--it is a tragic error.
    ENFJ | EIE | WEPL | 3w4 sx/so

  29. #1229
    Super harmonizing ILI one's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2020
    TIM
    Cool Beta Type
    Posts
    1,754
    Mentioned
    142 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eudaimonia View Post
    A well-developed ability to manipulate others.
    ...




  30. #1230
    Ксеркс, царь царей xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Miniluv
    Posts
    7,224
    Mentioned
    166 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    https://qz.com/1125805/the-reason-th...the-most-kids/

    ^ This is an interesting demographic trend. Women with graduate degrees (richer women, basically) are having as many babies as women with just a high school education. It didn't used to be like this (more educated women were less likely to have kids). But thanks to rising inequality, rich people have been able to afford babysitters and housekeepers more easily. And they can have kids and careers at the same time.

  31. #1231
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    12,468
    Mentioned
    1255 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xerx View Post
    https://qz.com/1125805/the-reason-th...the-most-kids/

    ^ This is an interesting demographic trend. Women with graduate degrees (richer women, basically) are having as many babies as women with just a high school education. It didn't used to be like this (more educated women were less likely to have kids). But thanks to rising inequality, rich people have been able to afford babysitters and housekeepers more easily, and they can have kids and careers at the same time.
    Nice. It's amazing what money can do. And everyone's getting more of it.

    https://jabberwocking.com/raw-data-m...robably-think/

  32. #1232

  33. #1233
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    12,468
    Mentioned
    1255 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default


    Great article, @Poptart. It shows the motivations behind the support for Republican candidates, where bald-faced lying is a requirement for office.

    Studies by Haidt (https://yourmorals.org/) show that Conservatives have more morals than liberals, but certain kinds of morality place group coherence over the truth. So lying for the cause can be an indicator of conservatism.

    https://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2021/07/the-lying-is-the-point

    https://thebaffler.com/salvos/the-long-con
    Last edited by Adam Strange; 09-24-2021 at 04:26 PM.

  34. #1234
    The Evening and the Morning Star Eudaimonia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    EIE-D 3w4 Sx/So
    Posts
    2,123
    Mentioned
    98 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/514246/are-roman-dodecahedrons-worlds-most-mysterious-artifact

    The Mysterious Bronze Objects That Have Baffled Archaeologists for Centuries
    With mind distracted, never thinking, "Death is coming,"
    To slave away on the pointless business of mundane life,
    And then to come out empty--it is a tragic error.
    ENFJ | EIE | WEPL | 3w4 sx/so

Page 31 of 31 FirstFirst ... 212728293031

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •