Quote Originally Posted by InvisibleJim View Post
Well that's a complex one because I don't believe intertype relations identify relationship compatibility; more the 'ease of information exchange' (sic. information can be both positive and negative). I don't think I would want to use Socionics 'in anger' to try to prioritise partners.
"in anger" ..? was this Fe polr, Te base or what exactly? or just plain BS. All the communication that this thread has sunk into only proves what a "golden rule" Socionics is: a bunch of folks I'm sort of neutral or indifferent towards have started moralizing and throwing shit as trophies on the altar of "socionics intertype relationships".