Rat is not IEI He said so himself in that thread. I told you when you joined you expressed yourself similar to me. Remember? I felt that with @darya too
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I went through the dichotomies one by one and in the process eliminated until I was pretty sure of my results but I was seriously considering EII but I don't feel I am like any of the EII here..
I realized that analyzing each one was the logical thing to do instead of reading descriptions of different types that fit a little bit and some that were closer but not where it counted. I know why I can appear EII to some but once you get to know me I am pretty sure the difference is blatant.
Anyway, I test IEI too but breaking it down it was easier to choose traits that fit instead of answering questions that I did not completely understand the context of until I read about the dichotomies. A lot of it is intuition too. I use my inner reactions of attraction/repulsion and then I drew a tarot card to confirm...for good measure.
I don't even think the EII's would welcome me as one of their own. hahahah
People are so complex that unless you interact with them personally and share info you can't really tell what they are by random posts.
Edit: I also remember telling you that you would meet your dual somewhere in this thread when I "read" you. Did it happen yet?![]()
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
oh, please... I just can't see it at all. I mean, I can be convinced with good reasoning, as I don't know what @McBain's type is... but that's like the last thing that'd come to mind.
.