What is his type? He self-types IEE.
What is his type? He self-types IEE.
“Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage.”
― Anais Nin
He's whatever type thinks I'm ISTj. In other words he's one of a kind. We should open a new quadra for him.
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
If you had to pick from a pool of types, what would be in that pool?
Does anyone need a band-aid? I have band-aids. That was scathing.
Last edited by Scapegrace; 12-26-2013 at 04:53 AM.
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
So sorry, didn't mean to burn you there
sp
How did you think while growing up and interpreting, analyzing, and/or dealing with the world around you (eccentricities of thinking that you felt made you different from others)? How has that changed from how you are now and why do you think you changed?
for some reason I have ESE in my mind and it won't go away. Did someone tell me JB was an ese?
Perfect<------------------------------------------------------------------------------>Loops and Tings
Ambivert / Aggressor / Trailblazer / Nomad / Alpha Caretaker / Free Spirit / Kevlar Speed Demon / Ninja
The only difference between my system and mainstream socionics are the definitions of the cognitive functions. I abide by the rules of intertype relations, but I prefer my definitions of the functions because they explain intertype relations.
The reason why my typings make no sense to you is because you have no idea how to type. You can't even type yourself, lol. LSE for William? Only if LII for Johannes Bloem!
Nobody has shown me any evidence thus far besides "EVERYONE ELSE SAYS I AM THIS TYPE!" That don't mean shit to me.
You don't even know what a Ti-ego looks like!
You allege that I pull shit out of my ass, and then you say that I'm Ti/Fe valuing but offer no proof. That right there is blind hypocrisy.
I dare say "annoying as fuck"
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Wow, there's a piece of christian "turn the other cheek"...
Based on what interaction I had with JoBlo there is something with his Ti; He looks for internal consistency of communication and will attack any position that conflicts with a position that the same person had previously expressed. He values that above factual, authorative or emotional arguments. Also he goes out of his way to "test" people who do try to use factual, authorative or emotional arguments. If he finds them lacking he reacts with a strong counterattack that is, interestingly ennough, mostly of what I'd say to be ethical tone; he attacks the person, almost seemingly punishing them for their inconsistency.
That said, I've got no clue about typing... I'd say he's ethical with the need to have consistent people around him. Ti dual seeking? Fi creative?
Also, he's only annoying if you equate yourself to what you're saying... if you feel annoyed it's probably because you're too attached to the thing he's messing with ;-)
Ohh, you remind me of that guy, Bolt. I think he changed his name though. I think he self-types ILE; he seemed to enjoy arguing with people; you seem to as well. IEE or ILE is probably about right or something. Maybe ESE or EIE.
The16Types.info - hostile action against ILI´s
I don't think Joblo has relaxed enough to be approaching his posts from his strengths. He is using his weaknesses and asking for us to see that and help him move on from them, maybe in due time he will. IEE are individualists, yet so are ILEs. I don't think we have yet to see the face of Joblo, we have only seen what he is 'not'.
As usual, I only take sincere self-typings as true. The real challenge for myself and I am sure others comes in seeing in what different ways the sociotypes may manifest in different individuals, and let that broaden our own views on what the types may look like, say, do.
I encourage JoBlo to take into consideration what others say, think, act towards him. Let it burn away the fat Joblo, even the negative comments, the truth can be hard to face. And If the truth confirms what you already know, then I will take your word for it.
Last edited by wacey; 12-27-2013 at 05:58 PM.
I don't know what you mean by this.
And I sincerely believe, if not know with certainty, that I am IEE. I used the same typing methodology I use for everyone else to reach this conclusion.
There is always room to learn, you're right. Even though I hate Betas I still must live with them, and part of that is learning and accepting their rules.
It means Jo, that you behave like a jerk here. I think several people have been trying to point this out to you. Is it really that important for you to be right (Ti polr), or is that how you are (Ti-Base)?
This is undoubtedly the most insightful response in this thread. Here's a snippet from an SLI-IEE duality description:
Here's a video of Michael Jordan, who I think might be SLI. The man on the phone in the beginning of the video I think is LSI:The Psychologist very much needs a caring partner and finds relaxation for his emotional and restless soul in the 'quiet haven' of a friend, who is constant in his words and deeds, reliable and faithful.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovrqZ7vZVmU
Notice how often Michael says, "I've always thought", or "I've never done".
So because I use some Jungian terminology I lose all credibility? Dude, "auxiliary" and "creative" mean the same fucking thing! They are names for a type's second strongest and second most valued function. Furthermore, I think "auxiliary" is better to use than "creative" because it denotes the secondary role of the second function in the ego block. Couldn't the first function in the ego block also be "creative"?Socionics divides people into 16 different types, called sociotypes. They are most commonly referred to by their two strongest functions, which in socionics are called the leading function (Jung's dominant) and the creative function (Jung's auxiliary).
You really need to get over yourself. I know you're just mad because you made a blog where you post like you know what you're talking about, and now that my ideas are threatening your conception of socionics, you're scared of being embarrassed.
Typical Beta NF: "you must follow EVERY SINGLE RULE of system, even the INSIGNIFICANT or INEXPEDIENT ones." Since they suck at figuring out what to do on their own because of their weak Te, they seek systems for guidance and clarity.
You're IEI. LIE "goes skydiving" and "builds businesses", not "plays guitar" and "looks soulful".
@Narc
You just proved my point twice, Socionics isn´t that different from MBTI may even worse so.
It may be strongly stereotyped but that it´s what it is and he got a point on what is most likely to be true.
If I proved anything, it was your opinion. You'd require something of substance to be putting forward a point.
Socionics is different enough from MBTI that it's actually useful, but MBTI is still the system touted around in offices and administered by doofy HR people that post their magic Forer effect stories on LinkedIn.