Dam.. I don't see why one would have such an outburst at what @SnatchYourWeave said :/.. idk, what she says is usually very easy to understand and follow. Kinda relaxing tbh..
But yeah. That was some awesomely quick escalation from plainly having different images of "types". Lol. Get a life. It's pathetic getting this triggered over socionics bullshit.
I mean, people need to get a life. Getting like this over bullshitty socionics rabbitholes....not worth it lol. Pardon, Astronics rabbitholes.
LOL, it is a freaking useless rabbithole. Nobody who I care about IRL cares about typology and we are all better for it. Ironically, the only person who did care about it was an abusive asshat due to ridiculous type-based assumptions. And anytime I get too sucked into typology is when my relationships fall apart because individual differences ironically become discarded for overly intellectualized mental masturbation. People's own individual histories are just as important as their supposed type in order to get a complete picture.of a person.
Like shotgunfingers seems like a very good example of a LSI but that doesn't mean he can speak to the full spectrum of experience of an LSI and neither can other LSIs necessarily speak on his behalf to fully understand his experience. The same can be said for you and snatch in your respective typings. Otherwise, it just becomes blind arrogance.
I understand typology is essentially a way of processing information but there are biases outside of type which can influence overall presentation. This is probably a major factor in why there are several different interpretations and disagreements regarding typology and Socionics in the first place.
However, it is a fun thought exercise just as long as one doesn't take it too seriously. It, afterall, is just one tool of many.
Last edited by SojournInLimbo; Today at 08:48 AM.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk