Results 1 to 36 of 36

Thread: ESTj is the stereotypical Enneagram type 1 thread split

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    "Cool Mafia Godfather" ~SLE Leader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    TIM
    ESTp 8
    Posts
    918
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default ESTj is the stereotypical Enneagram type 1 thread split

    ...ESTJ is Enneagram 1...

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    17,948
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Agee The Great View Post
    ...ESTJ is Enneagram 1...
    If and only if LSE is E1, then where do you put LSI at not to mention ESI and even LII?

  3. #3
    "Cool Mafia Godfather" ~SLE Leader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    TIM
    ESTp 8
    Posts
    918
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Absurd View Post
    If and only if LSE is E1, then what where do you put LSI at?
    Never said LSE was the only E1. LSE is the stereotypical 1.

    LSI is more on the spectrum between 1 and 9.

    Those are the two types that can only ever be 1...

  4. #4
    ■■■■■■ Radio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    2,571
    Mentioned
    154 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Agee The Great View Post
    Never said LSE was the only E1. LSE is the stereotypical 1.

    LSI is more on the spectrum between 1 and 9.

    Those are the two types that can only ever be 1...
    All rational types can be 1s, in theory. I could go on explaining how but it will take a lot of effort so let's just say I'm right and you're wrong.

  5. #5
    "Cool Mafia Godfather" ~SLE Leader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    TIM
    ESTp 8
    Posts
    918
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Radio View Post
    All rational types can be 1s, in theory. I could go on explaining how but it will take a lot of effort so let's just say I'm right and you're wrong.
    The only reason why it would take you any effort would be because you'd be wasting your time constructing a lie out of nothing.

  6. #6
    ■■■■■■ Radio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    2,571
    Mentioned
    154 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Agee The Great View Post
    The only reason why it would take you any effort would be because you'd be wasting your time constructing a lie out of nothing.
    ???

    Quote Originally Posted by Agee The Great View Post
    And as for E8, ISTp is between 9 and 8.
    You are pretty much pulling these correlations out of your ass.

  7. #7
    Creepy-pokeball

    Default

    A lot of types are E1. There is no direct correlation -- just constraints and probabilities. So, an E8 has a strong possibility to be an ESTp or ESTj, among others. Therefore... people could be receiving a lot of their perception from both of these seemingly similar E8 possibilities. See?

  8. #8
    "Cool Mafia Godfather" ~SLE Leader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    TIM
    ESTp 8
    Posts
    918
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ...Sorry, but that's wrong. Are you going to tell me that there are ISFp 1s? An ESFj 1? ESFp 1? No...Types on socionics correlate specifically to certain types on the enneagram.

    And as for E8, ISTp is between 9 and 8. ESTp is 8.

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    17,948
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Agee The Great View Post
    Those are the two types that can only ever be 1...
    Post a thread and invite LIIs and ESIs this forum has to offer, LIIs and ESIs self-typing E1. By that kind of reasoning those two shouldn't even exist which is fine with me, although I still don't know whether E-type commands sociotypes to oblige or is the other way around. So you tell me.

    You never said "only". I got that.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jadae View Post
    A lot of types are E1. There is no direct correlation -- just constraints and probabilities. So, an E8 has a strong possibility to be an ESTp or ESTj, among others. Therefore... people could be receiving a lot of their perception from both of these seemingly similar E8 possibilities. See?
    Nice wording, don't let siuntal respond to this.

  10. #10
    Darn Socks DirectorAbbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Southwest USA
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    7,123
    Mentioned
    380 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Agee The Great View Post
    ...ESTJ is Enneagram 1...
    I have an LSE friend who's a 3.

    LSE
    1-6-2 so/sx
    Johari Nohari

    Quote Originally Posted by Ritella View Post
    Over here, we'll put up with (almost) all of your crap. You just have to use the secret phrase: "I don't value it. It's related to <insert random element here>, which is not in my quadra."
    Quote Originally Posted by Aquagraph View Post
    Abbie is so boring and rigid it's awesome instead of boring and rigid. She seems so practical and down-to-the-ground.

  11. #11
    "Cool Mafia Godfather" ~SLE Leader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    TIM
    ESTp 8
    Posts
    918
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Director Abbie View Post
    I have an LSE friend who's a 3.
    Then your friend is either, A. Not LSE, B. Not E3, or C. Neither

  12. #12
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    17,948
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    What is DA's friend, then?

  13. #13
    Darn Socks DirectorAbbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Southwest USA
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    7,123
    Mentioned
    380 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Agee The Great View Post
    Then your friend is either, A. Not LSE, B. Not E3, or C. Neither
    You are a fool.



    This is out-of-date, but it still makes my point.

    LSE
    1-6-2 so/sx
    Johari Nohari

    Quote Originally Posted by Ritella View Post
    Over here, we'll put up with (almost) all of your crap. You just have to use the secret phrase: "I don't value it. It's related to <insert random element here>, which is not in my quadra."
    Quote Originally Posted by Aquagraph View Post
    Abbie is so boring and rigid it's awesome instead of boring and rigid. She seems so practical and down-to-the-ground.

  14. #14
    "Cool Mafia Godfather" ~SLE Leader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    TIM
    ESTp 8
    Posts
    918
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Lol I don't see how posting a picture of minesweeper proves your point, but sure whatever you say.

    People shouldn't even be combining socionics with the enneagram anyways. Two seperate theories, and apparently just one of either of them is more than enough for people to handle.

    Especially when someone goes and says something like this... "Im LSI Tritype E8w7-637-251 sx/so/sp INFJ RCLUEI Type B Personality"

    If you want to combine shit, go read the enneagram carefully, and then come back and read each socionics function carefully. If you have any shred of intelligence and insight, you'd see that everything you people are saying doesn't add up.

    ST must relate to the Gut Triad 9,8,1

    NT must relate to the Head Triad 7,5,6

    NF must relate to the Heart Triad 4,3,2 with the exception of some types that im not sure of, which would probably if anything relate to 6 which is probably the most dominant enneagram type

    SF the same as NF
    Last edited by Leader; 03-21-2012 at 10:12 PM.

  15. #15
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,313
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don't even think enneagram is worth investing in, it's too limited. Sure you can classify people with it to a certain extent, but it's not going to prove much, you have to assume their type is actually suitable and not 'one of the nine types of people.' I agree that all of these specific subtypes going along with Socionics are unnecessary.

  16. #16
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    17,948
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Agee The Great View Post
    Lol I don't see how posting a picture of minesweeper proves your point, but sure whatever you say.
    I did see your thread on enneagram-socionics correlations and it actually looks the same even though it is "different".

    People shouldn't even be combining socionics with the enneagram anyways. Two seperate theories, and apparently just one of either of them is more than enough for people to handle.
    You just bashed yourself saying that but there is a way out, you can always say you're not people as in part of people. Not human.

    Especially when someone goes and says something like this... "Im LSI Tritype E8w7-637-251 sx/so/sp INFJ RCLUEI Type B Personality"
    Leave that to Aleksei or Gilly.

    If you want to combine shit, go read the enneagram carefully, and then come back and read each socionics function carefully. If you have any shred of intelligence and insight, you'd see that everything you people are saying doesn't add up.
    ?

  17. #17

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Moons of Uranus
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    629
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Agee The Great View Post
    Lol I don't see how posting a picture of minesweeper proves your point, but sure whatever you say.

    People shouldn't even be combining socionics with the enneagram anyways. Two seperate theories, and apparently just one of either of them is more than enough for people to handle.

    Especially when someone goes and says something like this... "Im LSI Tritype E8w7-637-251 sx/so/sp INFJ RCLUEI Type B Personality"

    If you want to combine shit, go read the enneagram carefully, and then come back and read each socionics function carefully. If you have any shred of intelligence and insight, you'd see that everything you people are saying doesn't add up.

    ST must relate to the Gut Triad 9,8,1

    NT must relate to the Head Triad 7,5,6

    NF must relate to the Heart Triad 4,3,2 with the exception of some types that im not sure of, which would probably if anything relate to 6 which is probably the most dominant enneagram type

    SF the same as NF
    Their isn't a correlation thats set in stone like that^^.. The enneagram is more about instinctual energies and motivations that can't really be tied to functions. Although I do agree that their is a general correlation, I've known quite a few people who disprove the one you've given. Haven't you ever seen an ENFp 7w6? or an ST 6w5? I think tritype plays MAJORLY into things, so even if an ST is a main heart type which isn't common they probably have somthing more earthy or gutsy as a close second.. also sometimes a persons main type is very strong and some people have a more overlapping tritype. Like me I've always had trouble discerning whether I'm 4w5 or 1w9....

  18. #18
    "Cool Mafia Godfather" ~SLE Leader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    TIM
    ESTp 8
    Posts
    918
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by octo View Post
    No.
    The main reason why none of what im saying makes sense to you is because you have no sense. Makes sense?

  19. #19
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    25,960
    Mentioned
    669 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Anna1921 View Post
    Couldn't many, many types say the things in BOTH of those lists?
    Maybe, especially Te since Te is involved with watching and observing how things work and observing, comparing.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jadae View Post
    A lot of types are E1. There is no direct correlation -- just constraints and probabilities. So, an E8 has a strong possibility to be an ESTp or ESTj, among others. Therefore... people could be receiving a lot of their perception from both of these seemingly similar E8 possibilities. See?
    I agree; I haven't found any one to one correlation between Sociotype and E.
    Last edited by Beautiful sky; 03-22-2012 at 02:18 AM.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
    Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •