Private vid - needs you to log in and have specific permission from owner.
Private vid - needs you to log in and have specific permission from owner.
Reason is a whore.
It was private but now it's public again.Originally Posted by Geminatronix
That looks beautiful.Because
Because
Wow, that is pretty. At first it was going by a frame per second and i anticipated it to be curdled milk.... as in... 'out of date'... but then it sped up and i was pleased.
Now this is a story all about how, my type got changed, turned upside down. Just wait for a minute and watch chatbox right there, & I'll tell how Gem became the moderator with blue hair.
In typology central friended and praised, on the picture thread was where she spent most her days. Chilling out, selfies, relaxing all cool, And all typing some people and getting them schooled.
When a couple of girls who were up to no good, Started annoying her & her friends in the forumhood, She got in one little flame war & got pissed off & said 'I'm moving in with that exboyfriend in the forum with the socionics toffs.
So Gem pulls up to the forum for a year without being a hater, And yells to typocentral 'Yo creeps! Smell Ya later', Became a mod in her kingdom she was finally there, To sit on her throne as the mod with blue hair.
InvisibruJim
@Name13, I'm still feeling junior ENTJ, do not see SEE at all.
Ofc I could be wrong, everyone could, the true answer could be 142. I'll offer ENTJ for now though.
Now this is a story all about how, my type got changed, turned upside down. Just wait for a minute and watch chatbox right there, & I'll tell how Gem became the moderator with blue hair.
In typology central friended and praised, on the picture thread was where she spent most her days. Chilling out, selfies, relaxing all cool, And all typing some people and getting them schooled.
When a couple of girls who were up to no good, Started annoying her & her friends in the forumhood, She got in one little flame war & got pissed off & said 'I'm moving in with that exboyfriend in the forum with the socionics toffs.
So Gem pulls up to the forum for a year without being a hater, And yells to typocentral 'Yo creeps! Smell Ya later', Became a mod in her kingdom she was finally there, To sit on her throne as the mod with blue hair.
InvisibruJim
Are LIEs boss? What types dedicate their lives to becoming as powerful as possible and being ethical? Yeah, I might be a speshul snowflake 142.
I really do not see SEE. But I honestly cannot tell.
Socionics -
the16types.info
D:you don't seem to be a bitch like most ESI (especially some special ESI)
the creepy robot voice renders this unwatchable
I can not say for certain that you are, in fact, human
All I know is that I'm definitely not ExE.
Are you scared?
Maybe I'm a speshul ILE?
This is one of the things about Reinin's book which is not consistent with my self typing and I'm inclined to doubt it a bit. A lot of the look-alike traits he posits in the end of the book are more SLE ish for me than ILE ish. I think maybe the traits there may have a variance of display which isn't 100% true to the book. From his book I would probably type SLE, but I'm not sure if this is the right typing.
Also in his book, his description on the third function may be a bit wrong which can lead to the incorrect analysis. The role function is kind of like a obligation while the base function is just something fundamental, it does take a lot of energy to deal with the third function but it's often a large role in a individual's life.
GIVE ME MOAR ATTENTION
When you say the third function, you talk about the role function, but in the book his third function is the mobilizing function.
I like the way he simplifies it.
1st Function is Base, -1st function is ignoring.
2nd function is creative, -2nd function is demonstrative.
3th function is mobilizing, -3th function is polr.
4th function is suggestive, -4th function is suggestive.
Just look at the type descriptions to see the comparison.
Also, when he says that people spend a lot of time defending their 3th function, he is talking about the mobilizing function. When you atk someone on this function, it really makes them react, sometimes in a unreasonnable fashion. (I experienced it at work with a girl with Ti as Mobilizing, she would get sooo pissed when I tolled her she made a mistake counting the money in the register. SEI: Ignoring Se, makes a lot of mistakes interacting with real life objects, needs a lot of concentration doing so. Succeptable to facts also.)
My logic isn't solid. It changes everyday. This is what I believe for now, but tomorrow?, who knows..
One thing that's for sure, now I can see the IM more clearly then before.
I type using my relations to people, and seeing what IM they need or don't need. I love Kalinauskas wheel: for what we need, don't need, want, don't want, Good and Evil etc..
Almond milk is my one true love.
Marista, I'm SEE not ESI. Edit this please.anyone can be that way it's the typical attitude that counts, I would say that typically, you don't seem to be a bitch like most ESI (especially some special ESI)
What is wrong with you? why do you keep quoting me? I can't understand why you don't get my point and move on. I'm not interested in ever talking to you or people like you. You're mean.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Hey. hey, hey now. I'm just letting you know I'm SEE now on the chance that "some special ESI" meant a colorful ESI who is now SEE. SEE-Se. If it's not, disregard.
and you said this:
Originally Posted by Maritsa
anyone can be that way it's the typical attitude that counts, I would say that typically, you don't seem to be a bitch like most ESI (especially some special ESI)
I don't care what you type yourself.
Dual type
Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Lol, Ok, Marista. I quoted what you said about a "special ESI". That is all.
Mmmmk.
------------------------------------------------
Anyways.
I think she might be IEE
Ohhhhh shiiiit, it's getting intense in here.
Why IEE? I think it's likely.
I felt like I had to announce my love of almond milk to improve this thread. I'm glad you like almond milk too.I love almond milk too!
But surely, if you had strong Se, you would have noticed that it's actually Ultra Pasteurized Heavy Whipping Cream being poured into the coffee, and not almond milk, yes?
I just watched the videos you posted. Literally. My audio is broken on my computer.So I can't hear you, but just from the way you speak, you seem to be Ej & Ni-creative, either EIE or LIE.
I'd have to interact with you more to settle on a final typing, but those are my hunches right now.
Could you explain your reasoning?
you act buggerish and annoying in chat. you also come off as very detached, like you talk a lot but there's no personal connection there. not like playful banter that eases up conversation, rather just... disjointed, hollow commentary. there's nothing feelery about you, i think, and i highly doubt IEE/SEE.
/2c
Lol do you have something against me? I'm not offended, I appreciate honesty. Yeah, I'm a very self-involved sort of person. I'm not people-oriented at all though I'm constantly relating things back to my own feelings (whether I like/dislike something or find something good/bad). What do you think?
Get her, Radio.
My sig makes me happy.
6w7-2w3-1w2 so/sx
Those two types seem so divergent why would you choose those. I mean I can understand something like SEE and SEI because one is introvert and other extravert. But LSE would imply that the person places Logic before Ethics and although Ethics does come secondary to and SEE still I do see that there's a lot of similarity in Sensing aspect.
Dual type
Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I'm very sensing but my thinking and feeling are a lot more ambiguous.
6w7-2w3-1w2 so/sx
I'm the ultimate contradiction.
6w7-2w3-1w2 so/sx
how so?
Dual type
Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Often rationals(j) doubt between sensing and intuition and irrationals(p) between feeling and thinking. That is because creative and mobilizing function (hidden agenda) are more easily mistaken for each other than base and suggestive function.
That's interesting. Could you explain some more?
6w7-2w3-1w2 so/sx
My personality isn't that consistent because I'm easily bored.
6w7-2w3-1w2 so/sx
You have to be more concret about what I should explain. Are you familiar with Model A http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...-of-the-Psyche?
Huh? I like bright colors.
This is the second stupidest thread I've read here.
what type do you think you are Name13 and why?
OK now I see you have typed yourself as LSE. I have no idea why people even do "type me" threads here because they seem to only get stupid responses about irrelevant stuff like hair and face shape and what colors you like.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
Second stupidest? I have no clue. Not beta though. I think I have a lot of delta values though.
Lol
6w7-2w3-1w2 so/sx
Now I am.
6w7-2w3-1w2 so/sx
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
