Ehhh, you got jadaed again.
Ehhh, you got jadaed again.
"Too many eyes to see through, too many people to consider..." sounds like overextended Ne to me. "What have people seen as your weaknesses? What do you dislike about yourself?Weaknesses mentioned: always forget some dumb detail in fast paced work (daydreaming), not always in touch with own self..." seems like lack of Si. "How do you choose your friends and how do you behave around them? I choose my friends on accident. I fall in love with people easily, and then either become jaded with them or retain them for life. Sometimes the former can be a huge problem, because I desire to still love them as people, even when it may be bad for me...." You're definitely something under the xxFx umbrella. Choosing friends accidentally puts you as the "Merry" Reinin Dichotomy, so either Alpha or Beta Quadra, without question.
Your type is really interesting. Right now I have you down to EIE, IEI, ESE, or SEI, and I have yet to figure out which. I think given the lack of Si, I'm gonna go with IEI or EIE... that's my thought. From my point of view, you seem fairly well balanced, which is good but makes it harder in a way.
question is not type related.
question is not type related but my personal opinion is that wanting autonomy in a relationship is one step away from having an open relationship and the only difference is "permission" both are shitty things because both undermine the actual value of a relationship; why have a relationship at all then if you just exist as two things in one space, even one's own dog needs love and attention; so the only point of autonomy is to just be there for the sex? How about the emotional warmth?
it seems to me that this is counter to the concept of Socionics because the whole point of duality is for two halves to merge. That two people, who do have their distinctness also have their distinct "weaknesses" and therefore they need a certain degree of participation and "substitution", I think, honestly if you want two people to be there for the sex then you would be well matched with someone of your own type therefore you can feel the same emptiness and yet never ask for the substitution that comes from a whole unit. I wouldn't suggest someone get a dual for this type of a relationship because it's not only a waste but it's also emotionally draining for the other party who I'm sure would want more of a loving connection.
above is not type related
question is not type related.
not type related as anyone of the same type may respond differently based on what they "really love" or really hate.
.
not type related; people are not machines
.
@Saberstorm
um, not type related.
Dynamic type; function involved in seeing the process of work is Te.
I most need help in being less self-critical. I enjoy those that remind me what I remind others, which is that life is just life, and that I am just human. [/quote]
Um...yeah seems Fi seeking. I was hoping you would write more of a Ti seeking answer but I can't fiddle with this and give you a Ti seeking response, unfortunately![]()
not enough info
If you were to raise a child, what would be your main concerns, what measures would you take, and why?
.
Where they grew up, how they were socialized, and that their innocence was protected as a defenseless youth. [/quote]
very practical answer. None of your speech is emotional as in "I would LOVE" ETC.
Judging function on the reasonableness and functionality of something. Extravert because in a crowd they feel overwhelmed by the sensory stuff too much to see while introverts introvert and become either more relaxed or calm.
Te.
LSE
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
BTW:
What have people seen as your weaknesses? What do you dislike about yourself?Weaknesses mentioned: always forget some dumb detail in fast paced work (daydreaming), not always in touch with own self, mood swings. I often walk off mid-conversation on accident, where my mind takes me. I don't mean to. In myself, I dislike nothing. We are fine as is, and screw anyone that thinks otherwise.
This answer is awesome and makes me smile... sometimes I think it's important to be able to forget details due to daydreaming (a sign you're looking at the forest and not the trees), and walking off mid-conversation on accident is a talent too few of us have. I do that to people and leave them hanging, and the funny thing is, they know it's just me and the way I am. Oh well. As the Strokes sang, "I think I'll be alright..."