Originally Posted by
Nunki
That makes Sincere sound even more plausible, then. Because in the context of friendship I do communicate emotion freely and without provocation (the only time I put a lid on that is if I think certain feelings might have a negative impact on the other person), and my relationships are generally either fairly spontaneous, with both of us playing our part in breaking the ice, or they never go anywhere. Also, there are a number of times when it's been me who had to warm someone else up, although I do usually play a passive role (much more in a general sense than an emotional sense) in my interaction with others.
I think it's pretty decently likely that I'm Ti > Te, because I have a very skeptical attitude toward external facts, evidence, and systems; I see them as being like statistics, in that they can be used to prove anything. Also, I dislike research and trivia. I do like efficiency, though, which isn't to say that I'm good at it, because I'm not.
Okay, but if I'm an LII, where's the Si and Ne valuing? The Ne I could probably accept (some aspects of it are very correct; I don't relate to the wacky, random inventor side and I'm not particularly focused on potentiality, but creativity and attention to essences are traits of mine), but more so than any other IM, Si seems like something that I specifically devalue. And if I do value Si, I almost certainly value Delta Si over Alpha Si.
Also, yay for warranting someone's first post (and no that isn't some kind of pathetic attempt at looking emotionally expressive).
Isn't stating how things are associated with Irrationality rather than Static?