@Maritsa, just to keep things fair, you have had your share of aggressive behavior. You have called posters "stupid" and "bitch," etc., and you have ranted and raved in chat.
So either Delta NFs can be aggressive, too (those delicate peace-loving fairies) or you are not EII.
@Eliza Thomason, I am not aggressive about wanting to be IEE and I am perfectly fine with you being IEE even if I often do not relate to you. There could very well a subtype divide here. I have never doubted I am IEE and my type has never been seriously questioned. However, there are people who think I am a different type (Gilly thinks I am ESE) and that's fine, too. It's the agenda of claiming all that is Delta NF and not allowing for Delta NFs that are not like you that bothers me. I am also bothered by the passive aggressiveness of taking a thread I opened and innocently stating that IEEs couldn't possibly like gore, right (however, no reference to my thread). What is the point of this? Why not make it a direct question with reference to my thread? (Passive) aggressiveness comes in all shapes and sizes. Maritsa has been openly aggressive in the past numerous times. You are passive aggressive at times.

There is re-typing someone because you honestly have an opinion and there is re-typing because it is some sort of weapon: "if she is a different type, her argument cannot be valid because she doesn't get it." I feel like with your attempt to retype us, it's a bit of both. The fun of socionics is that although people might share a type, they might not, for example, share an enneagram type. I am a 7w6 and you are something else, that will make us different even if we both process information primarily through NeFi. When I go to my home country, I find IEEs to be slightly different than they are here. And so on. I honestly wish you could meet me in real life. You would be surprised I think.