Park, according to this test, I'm either your type or LSE. Is this how you found out you're SLI?
Park, according to this test, I'm either your type or LSE. Is this how you found out you're SLI?
LSEOriginally Posted by ShadoW805
confirm final written in stone.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
No. But I find those 2 (technically 3) tests to usually yield accurate results. Which one did you take?
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
You could also try taking this one and post your results.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Sociofuckingbullshit has you bewildered because you're a sucker for stupid gay scams.
It is fine.
Idk, I went straight to that one under which u posted
Lol jinksis banned? What a dumbass. Well, that's what he gets
Thanks Maritsa for helping me out
That one didn't work. It's cool dude, that other test was pretty good
She wants the D.
Wow dude is that u wear a bag over your head? Lol invisiblejim just kidding
I'm sorry I meant is that WHY you wear a bag over your head? I thought u wanted to stay invisible
Yes to all of the above.
I am getting a "could be SLI" impression. @Maritsa, why are you so sure on LSE?
Who is that guy in the photo? If that's you, I'm sorry for making fun of u on the forum, I didn't know anyone was still reading this one
Oh right, I didnt noticeI have no idea who it is. He's something to do with socionics.
Hint: It is Victor DarkAngelFireWolf69. The most beautiful man ...
Socionics -
the16types.info
Seems to be more about external harmony than internal. More apologetic, less nonchalant and less goofy for HIS own fun.
Dual type
Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Idk if it's set in stone though. I did--and have in the past--ranked very high on sensing and thinking, which less me to believe I could be SLE OR LSE. I did not really see LSI as being my type, but I was convinced that I was SLI for a long time. I guess I'm still trying to figure that out. The LSE descriptions DO sound like me, but at the same time I doubt a lil bit that I could be this type. What are some stark differences between SLE and LSE? Like I said, scored very high in sensing and thinking, SLE or LSI are usually my results
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
