You are confusing logic with process. They are not the same. I am logical, and rational. Rational means I can justify my decisions to others. Logical means I make use of logic to select an option. Process is about work patterns. You cannot observe process here. What you saw was logic. Process is about the orientation to action. Following premises is not following process.
A result type uses reification to orientate. A process type uses abstraction. Reification is the use of logical spirals to move from a "generality" to a "specific" result. Abstraction is the movement of specific data into general positions. Specific to general is a process. General to specific is a result. This is to be observed in activity.
It is contrasted with that which is observed by justification (which is rational / irrational) or in decision making (which is logical or ethical.) There is not enough action here to measure process. You are looking at justifications and decision making.
A result orientation would be this: To reimagine the type description of the LIE so it can fit me, as I am seeking the result of intertype relations that seem to work. I am specifying my type from a conceptual spiral of reified generalities.
Reinin is easy if you are logical. It is based on the careful separation of fine distinctions. He is using micro categories.
Imagine it as questions:
1. How do you justify yourself? (That is the rational / irrational dichotomy.)
2. How do you make choices? (That is ethical / logical dichotomy.)
3. How do you orientate to action? (That is process / result.)
4. How do you break down observations? (Static / dynamic)
My activity is orientated to result seeking. My justification is rational, my choice based on logic.
Nobody here is smart enough to use Reinin.


Reply With Quote