Agreed. They are very good at accepting
Agreed. They are very good at accepting
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
This is correctOriginally Posted by UDP
What about Fe? Although SeFi's have the Se to go out of their way and include someone, FeSi's can be just as good at this with their Fe. What you are describing is situational depending on the person.Originally Posted by Phaedrus
FeSis include by asking loads of pointless questions, SeFis include through badass sexual jokes.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
You are probably right. I was thinking of "accepting" as not judging other people according to some socially accepted moral code of what is normal or not. The ESFps that I know (not that many though) are more accepting of people's differences and different lifestyles than the ESFjs I know (a few more of them), who might judge others or want to change them.What about Fe? Although SeFi's have the Se to go out of their way and include someone, FeSi's can be just as good at this with their Fe. What you are describing is situational depending on the person.
I think the idea of making people very included is an thing. The problem is that because people with can make people feel included, they can also make them feel excluded if they really want to.
ESFps are more like "I'm okay, you're okay" and don't think as much in terms of people being "inside the loop" and "outside the loop."
Also, I disagree that ESFps are always into crass behavior, those kinds of jokes, etc. They're jokers, they stretch the boundaries, and they shock people sometimes, but their content and manners depend a lot on how they were raised, just like anyone else.
There is a difference between (wanting to) making people 'feel included' (ethics) and recognizing and interacting with them ( sensing ). I don't think ESFps necessarily want to include or exclude people, but they will respond to the stimulus--- . ANd because they can aren't concerned with ethics, save for "Fi", that is why they can talk to you, say something, and walk away without really getting involved, so long as they feel they treated you decently, etc.
Does " detachment " make sense here?
Or, really, am I just stating it that way because it is a leading extraverted function, and I'm an introvert? hmm
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
That's a perceptive comment.
Hey...here's another angle to look at, regarding and ...What do people here like about these? What do you like (or dislike) about or about , or for that matter, and ?
...not liking or disliking specific people....but those functions and areas of consciousness themselves....