It's rumored that I have a type

[fen]

I still see Absurd and k0rp's discussions as little more than friendly banter.

I personally think there's some degree of sexual tension involved.

[Korpsy Knievel]

I can roll over you with ease Mr "in reality I answer your all questions" - the reality you traded for instrumentalism I take it, the reality you adhere to after trading it for instrumentalism.

You know nothing but you think you know everything, don't you?

Ask me again when you've figured out what the words you're using actually mean.

[Absurd]

Ask me again when you've figured out what the words you're using actually mean.

Those just mean you don't know what you're talking about, go play a trumpet.

[Korpsy Knievel]

Best thread ever.

[Korpsy Knievel]

This is nothing but an empty rationalization to justify your lunacy.

Your dedication to confirmation bias is amusing.

What you fail to differentiate is that an assumption can be based on facts or a relative sense of truth.

No, stupid, I don't.

Absurd is right in that you are more concerned with a relativistic interpretation of reality, this is something multiple members including me have noted about you.

Sounds good. List them.

I also find this thread exemplary of how the intellectual insecurity you possess leads you down a predictable response path. You need to stop pretending like you do anything more than evade questions, because that consists of the bulk of your communication in exchanges like this.

Hahaha, you're still whining from last week when you pretended I didn't answer your stupid question when I quite clearly said, "Because you're here making noise."

As a side note it's nothing short of hilarious how you are able to completely reject any sense of reality thrown at you. It doesn't seem to matter that you are the sole outlier in a multitude of similar accusations thrown at you, you still manage to reject the input as invalid and not process it. It takes a special kind of delusional person to operate like that.

Please tell me how to value popular opinion, you non-Fe valuer.

Why don't you try something different this time, and, oh I don't know, actually address what's been thrown at you? Why is it that you make these leaps in assumptions that have no grounds in reality? Or, more relevantly, how can you justify yourself being Te ego when much of what you say can not be substantiated through observable means? For all the bullshit you have spewed in this thread I, and pretty much anyone who has been familiar with you some time, will agree to what Absurd has been writing so why bother defending yourself at all.

Vide supra, "SEE". Pretty funny you'd take this stance as well because it shows that you also don't understand Absurd's dumb errors, not just him.

It's not like anything he wrote isn't clearly observable at a glance. I mean, does you making assumptions really need to be debated? Reading through what you wrote, much of your response to him could easily be labeled as projection when you fail at the same things you are accusing him of. I wrote a lengthier post, but I am condensing it into one simple message, and that is to stop being fake and accept the reality of who you are. Your inability to accept this is probably the most repulsive quality of yours, second only to the speed and magnitude of which you unload your malice on others.

Hahahahahaha, glass houses, brah.

Anyway to get on topic, as mentioned earlier, the intellectual insecurity reeks of head>heart, as well speaks in relation to the motivation of the 5. This is probably the most notable thing about you as far as motivations go. You have a heavy 4 wing and I would deduce are probably at the low-average to high unhealthy ranges of your type. This impression is heavier on me than the idea that of an identity itself or meaning being what you are looking for. Since you have a tendency to suppress your emotions it is very unlikely that you are a 4 since they tend to do the exact opposite as their emotions pertain to their identity. You are more or less ILI to me, but the boded earlier strikes me as very odd and would like to know what that is and how you see it reconciling as your type. Maybe it's just a result of being unhealthy.

So noted. Thanks for playing.

[thePirate]

Your dedication to confirmation bias is amusing.

Your use of invoking logical fallacies and cognitive biases on your opponents as an evasion tactic is growing tiresome. It was fun about 4 arguments ago but you really need a new schtick, particularly when each one you throw out is one you tend to delve in quite frequently. Show me that I am engaging in this bias, how have I selectively been looking for information to support this? There is little to no information as to contradict you relying on assumptions in the first place.

No, stupid, I don't.

Then don't respond in a way that indicates that. I am aware that you know the difference. Your failure in differentiating the two was in your defense against absurd, which by blurring the lines attempts to absolve you from any sense of objectivity. It's not only a duplicitous way of arguing, it doesn't actually absolve you from anything. Stupid.

Sounds good. List them..

You have a trademark tendency of asking for information, then when it is given you immediately find a way to discard or invalidate the stance of the person who gave you that information if it is unfavorable to you (I.E. list how many typology forums I'm on, you were on socionics, I quit Ganin's forum when I came here two years ago - so you have been on more then one forum bitching about your type, instead of owning up to that you immediately resort to trivializing his comment. It's a bullshit way of communicating) I am not going to go through the trouble of listing all the names of those who have noticed this about you in order to get to that conclusion. If you don't remember who you have argued with and their claims against you, that is your problem for being negligent in dealing with others. Absurd and I are two, start there. Think of your conversations on TC and IRC since you find yourself conveniently forgetting your conversations on the forum. This is really something that shouldn't take you that long to recall.

Please tell me how to value popular opinion, you non-Fe valuer..

As I mentioned above, if you are going to throw out a logical fallacy at me, it might be wise to refrain on engaging in it yourself. You are butchering socionics in order to validate your impression based typing methods, which by the way, you openly admitted to me was your main 'method'. Actually, it's not hard to ascertain that not only is that your way of typing people, but of processing information in general - which is fine except for some reason you have yet to admit that. Feel free to go ahead and argue this point though, I am literally jumping at the chance to prove that not only you have not comprehended what it was that I was saying, but that you are stretching IE definitions to fit where it doesn't belong. In the same vein, I can ask that in light of you literally just a few posts ago admitting to attempting to garner public votes/opinion, how you can continue to justify yourself as Fi valuing since it falls along the same lines of what you are accusing me of. Of course I wouldn't because that's a fucking stupid correlation like most of what your brain shits out.

Vide supra, "SEE". Pretty funny you'd take this stance as well because it shows that you also don't understand Absurd's dumb errors, not just him.

Whether or not I understand what Absurd is saying is a separate issue, if you think I am mistaken in my understanding then go ahead and point out his errors that are relevant to what I have mentioned above. I feel at this point obligated to give you the definition of what an assumption is - an assumption is something that is accepted as true without any proof. Take what you said about him being image conscious, show empirical data that illustrates this as opposed to the mindless extrapolations you littered this thread with.

Hahahahahaha, glass houses, brah..

Hahahahahah, deflection, brah..

[thePirate]

Your dedication to confirmation bias is amusing.

Your use of invoking logical fallacies and cognitive biases on your opponents as an evasion tactic is growing tiresome. It was fun about 4 arguments ago but you really need a new schtick, particularly when each one you throw out is one you tend to delve in quite frequently. Show me that I am engaging in this bias, how have I selectively been looking for information to support this? There is little to no information as to contradict you relying on assumptions in the first place.

No, stupid, I don't.

Then don't respond in a way that indicates that. I am aware that you know the difference. Your failure in differentiating the two was in your defense against absurd, which by blurring the lines attempts to absolve you from any sense of objectivity. It's not only a duplicitous way of arguing, it doesn't actually absolve you from anything. Stupid.

Sounds good. List them..

You have a trademark tendency of asking for information, then when it is given you immediately find a way to discard or invalidate the stance of the person who gave you that information if it is unfavorable to you (I.E. list how many typology forums I'm on, you were also on socionics and sociotypes --) I quit Ganin's forum when I came here two years ago. --) So you have been on more then one forum bitching about your type, and were a member so far of 3 that we know of. Instead of owning up to that you immediately resort to trivializing his comment. It's a bullshit way of communicating) I am not going to go through the trouble of listing all the names of those who have noticed this about you in order to get to that conclusion. If you don't remember who you have argued with and their claims against you, that is your problem for being negligent in dealing with others. Absurd and I are two, start there. Think of your conversations on TC and IRC since you find yourself conveniently forgetting your conversations on the forum. This is really something that shouldn't take you that long to recall.

Please tell me how to value popular opinion, you non-Fe valuer..

As I mentioned above, if you are going to throw out a logical fallacy at me, it might be wise to refrain on engaging in it yourself. You are butchering socionics in order to validate your impression based typing methods, which by the way, you openly admitted to me was your main 'method'. Actually, it's not hard to ascertain that not only is that your way of typing people, but of processing information in general - which is fine except for some reason you have yet to admit that. Feel free to go ahead and argue this point though, I am literally jumping at the chance to prove that not only you have not comprehended what it was that I was saying, but that you are stretching IE definitions to fit where it doesn't belong. In the same vein, I can ask that in light of you literally just a few posts ago admitting to attempting to garner public votes/opinion, how you can continue to justify yourself as Fi valuing since it falls along the same lines of what you are accusing me of. Of course I wouldn't because that's a fucking stupid correlation like most of what your brain shits out.

Vide supra, "SEE". Pretty funny you'd take this stance as well because it shows that you also don't understand Absurd's dumb errors, not just him.

Whether or not I understand what Absurd is saying is a separate issue, if you think I am mistaken in my understanding then go ahead and point out his errors that are relevant to what I have mentioned above. I feel at this point obligated to give you the definition of what an assumption is - an assumption is something that is accepted as true without any proof. Take what you said about him being image conscious, show empirical data that illustrates this as opposed to the mindless extrapolations you littered this thread with.

Hahahahahaha, glass houses, brah..

Hahahahahaha, deflection, brah..

[Korpsy Knievel]

Thanks for all the supervision, pirate. Good stuff.

[thePirate]

Thanks for all the supervision, pirate. Good stuff.

Given that I am not saying anything substantially different than others from various quadras, I would say you don't need to worry about a lack of 'supervisory' interaction. You have still not answered my question : Why is it that you make these leaps in assumptions that have no grounds in reality? Or, more relevantly, how can you justify yourself being Te ego when much of what you say can not be substantiated through observable means?

[Korpsy Knievel]

Given that I am not saying anything substantially different than others from various quadras, I would say you don't need to worry about a lack of 'supervisory' interaction. You have still not answered my question : Why is it that you make these leaps in assumptions that have no grounds in reality? Or, more relevantly, how can you justify yourself being Te ego when much of what you say can not be substantiated through observable means?

People use their creative function less than their base function and attach less personal significance to it, although due to the nature of blocked functions it is usually used in tandem with the base function. In their value system, their creative function activities seem less personally significant than their base function activities. When other people try to make this function the main criterion for everything, light irritation can arise, and the person may try to "correct" the other person's emphasis by presenting a perspective from his base function and suggesting that this is more important.

Use of the creative function — while frequent and effortless — seems to turn on and off. One moment the person may seem highly interested in this aspect, and the next — totally indifferent. This may jar people for whom this aspect of reality is of more supreme importance and who expect more consistent attention and effort in this area.

- http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.p...ative_function

[Gilly]

ILI-Ni 5w4 sx/so

[Korpsy Knievel]

Here's where you shout "IT'S OBVIOUS", unless of course you feel it expedient to play your other card and say "NOBODY CAN REALLY KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON".

[Korpsy Knievel]

Be nice to the mods and kick shins with me here or in one of my other threads so they aren't stuck with a bigger mess to clean up than already exists. Thanks.

[Korpsy Knievel]

Hi, Rusty.

You need to recognize the difference between a root cause and someones reaction to it. If you go slap some random woman in the ass, she's probably gona get pissed.. But you act like her emotional reaction somehow equalizes and justifies your fucked up behavior.

I see. Your use of "equalize" appears a bit idiosyncratic, so I'll have to ask for a clarification.

[rat1]

Balances, nullifies, disregards....


Wrong thread btw. Move it back there please.

[Korpsy Knievel]

Balances, nullifies, disregards....


Wrong thread btw. Move it back there please.

Sorry, it's in one of my threads or not at all. The mods hate stepping in and there's already more than they want to move around.

Now since you guys are experts on being assholes it'd be nice if you'd share your motivations and methods for it so I can be a dick more in accord with your enlightened preferences.

HAHAHA you think you are in a position to evaluate mental health? How laughable. And how easy to let yourself off the hook. A lot of the people that have qualms against you probably do have things that they are dealing with but to the degree of a mental disorder? To the degree that it would be justified to toss out ALL their viewpoints? These are more or less normal people coming to the same conclusions about you. You would think there would be more divergence given their degree of 'mental problems', but there are repeating and similar points of convergence that you keep failing to acknowledge. Who then is the delusional one here, derpsy?

It must be me since that's what keep telling one another and wallpapering over your own problems.

[rat1]

You didn't even respond to what I said. I think I'm done.

I bet you enjoy the fact I tell you that I'm done, don't you? You see it as a projection and a power play.

Meh. That is vying for an emotional connection. It is what forms the foundation of any exchange...

At times, my mind wanders. I am wandering for an attachment. When I say I am leaving, I am attaching myself to the idea of leaving, and seeing whether I find rest with the idea. That is the emotional nature...

But I really am done, because I have to sleep. Goodbye

[Korpsy Knievel]

You didn't even respond to what I said. I think I'm done.

I didn't read what pirate had to say either in his self appointed role as voice of the people. And your perception is just that, so have at it. You've just as great a right to wrongness and ignorance as anyone else, and there's nothing valuable about you to me that I'd disabuse you of your most cherished notions. Cheers.

[thePirate]

I didn't read what pirate had to say either in his self appointed role as voice of the people.

That's okay, this is a good showcase as to what kind of person you really are and how your thought processes work so hopefully others won't make the mistake of wasting their time with such a wretched and mentally unstable individual.

[Korpsy Knievel]

That's okay, this is a good showcase as to what kind of person you really are and how your thought processes work so hopefully others won't make the mistake of wasting their time with such a wretched and mentally unstable individual.

:D

[thePirate]

:D

It's almost sad how you demean yourself with responses like this. Face reality, asshole.

[rat1]

I didn't read what pirate had to say either in his self appointed role as voice of the people. And your perception is just that, so have at it. You've just as great a right to wrongness and ignorance as anyone else, and there's nothing valuable about you to me that I'd disabuse you of your most cherished notions. Cheers.

These threads have been nothing but you pretending to understand something, telling me I'm ignorant, but you've never described what it is you know. I'm really getting tired of you alluding to know something. That paper tiger folded a long time ago. You're the only person you're fooling.

[Scapegrace]

Shut the fuck up.

[rat1]

Suck me.

[Korpsy Knievel]

I CAN HAZ TYPEZ

[thePirate]

Shouldnt have been a giant ass if you wanted more responses

[Korpsy Knievel]

Shouldnt have been a giant ass if you wanted more responses

We're on page 3, stupid. And hush up, rat is sleeping.

[thePirate]

We're on page 3, stupid. And hush up, rat is sleeping.

Of which how many type responses you've gotten? Right, shut the fuck up.

[Korpsy Knievel]

Of which how many type responses you've gotten? Right, shut the fuck up.

I couldn't have asked for a better intertype response from adjoining quadras, so I've got no complaints whatsoever.

[thePirate]

I couldn't have asked for a better intertype response from adjoining quadras, so I've got no complaints whatsoever.

You could have, but have fun reveling in your imaginary gain.

[Korpsy Knievel]

You could have, but have fun reveling in your imaginary gain.

Intertype magic went down well before you stuck your snoot in it, buttpirate. And good job of fleeting tinycyhat when your beta accomplices passed out and the place filled up with gammas, "SEE".

[munenori2]

korpsy is a cylon.

[thePirate]

Intertype magic went down well before you stuck your snoot in it, buttpirate. And good job of fleeting tinycyhat when your beta accomplices passed out and the place filled up with gammas, "SEE".

I don't typically leave when people of any specific quadra are around, it just got boring most notably due to your presence. You would know that if you didn't conclude everything based only on your pov.

[Korpsy Knievel]

Poor baby.

[Korpsy Knievel]

Since pirate likes to invoke the opinions of "we", let's have a quick reminder:

http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...he-slate-clean

[thePirate]

Since pirate likes to invoke the opinions of "we", let's have a quick reminder:

http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...he-slate-clean

Let's not, you are boring enough as it is.

[Korpsy Knievel]

Let's not, you are boring enough as it is.

Keep yammering, I liquidated you a couple years ago.

[thePirate]

Keep yammering, I liquidated you a couple years ago.

Yawn.

[Olga]

Probably ILI, second guess goes to LIE

I see intuiton and logics - Ni. Do you know your type for sure? What the tests say?

[woofwoofl]

Shouldnt have been a giant ass if you wanted more responses

Of which how many type responses you've gotten? Right, shut the fuck up.

Ni-ILI 5w4 4[5]8 sx/sp. Eat shit and get the hell out of our quadra.

I don't typically leave when people of any specific quadra are around, it just got boring most notably due to your presence. You would know that if you didn't conclude everything based only on your pov.

Let's not, you are boring enough as it is.

Yawn.

Boring enough to repeat the same nothing thrice. And write paragraph after paragraph after paragraph of fluff and spastic emotional flailing. After accusing k0rps of being emotionally unstable.