I can't answer that without heavy coloration from other IEs, but: tending to be mentally elsewhere much of the time, pondering likely future events in light of past ones; habitual psychologizing of others w/ an eye toward development of individual worldview and constituent complexes; spacecase; regular experience when asked personal questions of the brain momentarily forkbombing itself with a myriad of effective conditions and divergent plausible outcomes as prognosticative reality modeling is performed (i.e. spherical Ne expansion of possibility then necessitates pick-a-path adventure selection along Ni trajectories to reach desirable goals); being very meta in general; strong mental visualization that is periodically more attentionally arresting than externally-originating visual stimuli; causing girlfriends to uniformly complain of an ability to mentally disappear on them without physically leaving the area and doing so in such a way that they're incapable of following (i.e. possessing the trait of evanescence, involutionarily disappearing into the self); etc.
If S is experiential immediacy and N is its potential, when combined with extra- and intro-version it's easy to see how one tends toward assurance of action while the other is assured of its implications, and so blah blah blah, overthinking wallflower + dopefiend pornstar = goddam magic.
Stupidly named dichotomy.
Related: http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...ightened-Being
Sage insights from a guy hanging his hat in the wrong quadra and who insists on your shotgun marriage to a blithe mongoloid. No wonder it's complicated.
I'd guess this designation of non-victimhood stems from Maritsa's influence. She's informed me that she knows I'm SLI because her dad walks around in his pajamas all day, continually dicking with the thermostat and demanding to know whether people are comfortable.



Reply With Quote