Well you know... we could put all those 181 words in one post and type each sentence. I do believe we would get different types/functions. This is why typing is so subjective...we pull out the things we want to and jellify and smeld into our own molds. I suppose a good 'typer' is one that makes a convincing argument.Originally Posted by Scapegrace
EDit: yeah maybe that's just stating the obvious ^^
Now this is a story all about how, my type got changed, turned upside down. Just wait for a minute and watch chatbox right there, & I'll tell how Gem became the moderator with blue hair.
In typology central friended and praised, on the picture thread was where she spent most her days. Chilling out, selfies, relaxing all cool, And all typing some people and getting them schooled.
When a couple of girls who were up to no good, Started annoying her & her friends in the forumhood, She got in one little flame war & got pissed off & said 'I'm moving in with that exboyfriend in the forum with the socionics toffs.
So Gem pulls up to the forum for a year without being a hater, And yells to typocentral 'Yo creeps! Smell Ya later', Became a mod in her kingdom she was finally there, To sit on her throne as the mod with blue hair.
InvisibruJim
Generally speaking, the more quality info one is given to work with, the better. Typing someone based on a very small paragraph is not a very good idea.
Johari/Nohari
"Tell someone you love them today, because life is short; shout it at them in German, because life is also terrifying."
Fruit, the fluffy kitty.
I got into MBTI and Enneagram because I'm very interested in how people work, what makes them tick. In a way I've always been fascinated by dysfunctional people too, and being able to see flaws in people just in general is very interesting. Socionics is just the third child that came without planning.
Please do.
lol
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Hm... is LOL a type?
False. That was another yeah-but. I just omitted the yeah.
Hi and welcome.
I like your username and your Burzum tshirt.
I'm bad at VI though, so I'm afraid I can't be of much help there. =/
And I would hide my face in you and you would hide your face in me, and nobody would ever see us any more.
Thank you.Hi and welcome.
I like your username and your Burzum tshirt.
I'm bad at VI though, so I'm afraid I can't be of much help there. =/
I won't use VI as a source of typing myself unless I can see it yielding some interesting results. Even what little you know I'd appreciate hearing.
A video would probably yield more meaningful suggestions than photos.
I honestly have noooo clue about a typing so far.
And I would hide my face in you and you would hide your face in me, and nobody would ever see us any more.
I remember you as if it was yesterday saying you don't type by one sentence.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
