Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa Darmandzhyan View Post
It's not makes sure in terms of controlling my choices; it's more about pointing out to me "you don't eat enough of x, you should take this." suggestions, but any suggestion to me from someone who consider to be right, is more of a "do this it's better for you" and I get that from my mom who is very controlling about what I eat; I think the way in which I expressed that was inaccurate, but the general meaning is still valid.
I think you expressed it exactly as you intended (as always) and you then want to counter-rationalize something more wholesome to how you ideally want it to be.

Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa Darmandzhyan View Post
Are you sure it's not a consensus based on rules that are reasonable? I don't know why you're still upset; and you can't let go of your emotions easily, it seems.
Internal and external consistency is a matter of character which Jadae does not have. I call a spade a spade; if I happened to cross Jadae in real life I would fire him because he is all personality and no character; a broken used car salesman or a second rate politician at best.

I have never met an LSE in my life who is willing to wobble their morals because it is socially convenient. Remember that Director Abbie link above? There's an LSE, someone who puts their money where their mouth is. I've met LSEs who are dedicated capitalists, some who are dedicated socialists, but none who were into playing social approval games and pandering to convenient easy solutions.

Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa Darmandzhyan View Post
I type Abbie SEE; I'll give you my reasoning in private, if you with otherwise I'm not going over it here.
Maritsa, you can't type. This has been already been established based on numerous threads where challenged you simply cannot provide an analytical proof with the appropriate caveats. Bare physiognamy is not typing. So don't send me a damned thing because it would be a waste of my time.