Block superego. 4th position: mobilization function - "The logic of relations"
Caesar's hard to be objective, because it is a captive of his ethical attitudes, their likes and dislikes.
His actions may be contrary to common sense, if only because that often they reflect his emotional attitude.
Sometimes the behavior of Caesar as a logical shift the significance of his actions, that is, it goes against common sense, based on some logical primitive stereotypes because "so decided to do." Moreover, in accordance with its logical stereotypes, it often comes at the expense of its ethical principles, for example, destroys a good relationship with your family because reacts as logically accepted, general concepts, and not, as he feels it is ethically: for example, blamed for something for which it is necessary (in the conventional, stereotypical) to scold, praise for what should be praised.
Sometimes this is expressed in the habit of using the surface logical (and ethical) stereotypes, to act in accordance with these slogans and utter them with or without cause, "pity humiliates man," "fear - the distinguished," "jealous - it means love," " where the bed, and sleep there, "" a woman should not take the initiative, "etc.
Sometimes it is a logical offset intonation and emphasis in speech. Sometimes it is ethically unjustifiable mimicry.
Sometimes it is biased or unstable interests to perceived information. For example: listening to the explanation, Caesar often distracted from the main idea, it suddenly takes an interest in some very minor or inconsequential moments particular. Without realizing it, he goes away from the main topic or distracting questions secondary importance. Or issues that are not relevant to the subject under discussion.
Another characteristic of the representatives of this type feature: the ability for the occasion and without distractions from the given topic to talk about themselves. (A clear example - Pushkin's lyrical digressions in "Eugene Onegin".)
Deal with the classification of concepts and knowledge, to bring them into a coherent system - for Caesar dull and dreary work. He finds it difficult to focus on the logical analysis of a phenomenon, it is difficult to concentrate for consistent understanding of logical conclusions, it is difficult to present something very consistent: it can begin the explanation right in the middle and keep it constantly going back to the early and middle stages. Thus, in the statement of Caesar even some simple explanations seem very confusing.
Superficial understanding of many phenomena it does not bother - he considers it natural ("We all learned a little something and somehow") The main thing that has been the subject of discussion even remotely, but the sign, you can not give the impression of complete incompetence.
Very cautious in his statements concerning the legal or technical side of things, no risk of sounding biased or incompetent
He does not like to study the instructions and rules - it's boring. (Representative of this type can often burn through the appliance, including, without reading the instructions known case of "unsuccessful" purge memory, after which were worn all built into a program) and no matter how sad his personal experience, it is still difficult to change Caesar himself, and he often relies not on the user, which is rare and little understood, and for good luck, good luck on your intuition, despite the fact that she did quite often fails.
Experience of other people's mistakes do not always produce enough impression on him as much as Caesar may confer and consult, but eventually go their own way, in spite of all the advice and common sense. Caesar has an exceptional ability to continuously "fill bumps" on one and the same place. Deeply afflicted, tormented and ask everyone, why is it every time it happens to him, and what deficiencies he needed to rid himself to finally end this scourge requires huge patience and endurance (qualities inherent in his dual Balzac) to teach Caesar analyze the experience of past mistakes, that is exactly what Caesar, against the wishes of others, refuses to do (and do not ask and do not persuade!) He acted and acts just as he pleases, but otherwise it just can not be yourself.
For Caesar serious problem need to think carefully about their actions, act cautiously and judiciously. Comments irrationality of their actions, he can not stand requirement to be consistent in their actions leads him out of himself. It is characterized by smart and logical to do only so long as it is not required to, as long as he is respected and considered him. But it is necessary to focus on its illogical as his actions immediately cease logically controlled and acquire the character of a disorderly, panicky rush.
Caesar's illogical accusations only exacerbate their problems. Caesar himself painfully tolerate any criticism, and since the requirements to itself it can be quite ambitious, it is difficult to recognize the presence of all of the advantages, such defects as faulty logic. Caesar even want to be a man without flaws. (And who would not like it?) Why Caesar was very upset when his mental faculties give a low estimate. It very difficult to afford to be the smartest (though it's best that he can do for himself.)
Note that Caesar's easier to be consistent and logical in his actions after he figured out the possibilities of the situation (the sequence of functions). For Caesar to behave reasonably - it is to act wisely, that is, as a precaution, foresight. Thoroughly than he will be informed on the aspect of "intuition of possibilities", the easier it is to act logically thought out.
In short, in order to in the actions of Caesar was less controversy and fuss, you need to put it in a psychological mode in which it will receive sufficient information on intuition capabilities, support for the intuition of time and, most importantly, the lack of criticism of the logic aspect ratios . That is Caesar need psychological support Balzac. His ability to show prospects the situation in such a way that they are not scared of Caesar and plunged into panic, the possibility of lead time to distract him from the bustle and create the conditions for his thorough logical analysis. Balzac was able to find the most simple and easy understanding of the form explaining. He is very methodical in his explanations, can illustrate their good examples. Is able to bring the interlocutor to the correct logical conclusion, giving himself to enjoy his discoveries.
Originally Posted by fenryrr
Reply With Quote
Which thing goes where. Please actually explain this instead of leaving it super open-ended like you expect me to magically read your mind. Pronouns are my enemies. Cooking with my ILE friend is literally one of the most stressful things. I might as well just let him cook cause if I cook he will criticize what I'm doing, but then not clearly explain what I need to do instead. GAH. He always asserts he knows the right way to do things, but I don't trust him because he doesn't even explain his reasoning behind things..just proposes them as truths, when I'd actually like to know what's behind why he thinks certain things. Mister, I know how to cook Tuna Helper. No, it doesn't need to cook longer. I followed the cooking time, and even went over like a minute. Why don't you actually bite one of the noodles to test if it's done instead of just assuming it isn't done. It's gonna turn to mush if I cook it more. HFKGAJLGAajlvha
Is it sad that the sorority I almost joined's mascot is a unicorn. 
