The quote is certainly there but as Radio pointed out, since it was meant to lampoon someone else it can't be taken at face value as you're trying to pretend it should be. Rather silly that you keep banging on about something with negative truth value in an effort to advance your agenda. More points for being a static thinker and kinda detached from reality.
I'm starting to wonder whether your grammar is deliberately this mangled to give you the appearance of having said something meaningful without actually saying anything at all.
Please list all the betas you think I've drawn to my side and give analyses of their respective types. Your habit of hand-waving without offering solid proof is a sure sign of a weak case.
More unadduced conjectural noise, though given your bratty outbursts when frustrated by counterfactuals (ignoring Te, anyone?), your present allies of convenience are advised to keep this tip of yours for their own later reference as a sort of future-retro "told ya so".



Reply With Quote