Quote Originally Posted by davez View Post
Hey. After learning MBTI for month or two I couldn't progress in determining my type, so I decided to give a shot in socionics. I love to analyse people through look and behavior all the time, and finally I found concept practiced by a lot of people. Finding VI is such a relief.

In MBTI i usually scored INTP/INTJ, but the river of "kids" that forced themselves to be this type put me in position to doubt the outcome of tests. It was hard to try to relate to other people with this type, because almost every person on forum presented other facts and forced to fit into very tight framework of particular type.

In enneagream i often scored 3 types: 5w4 5w6 8w7.

In Socionics test I scored:

Your Sociotype: LIE-1Ni (ENTj)

Other Possible Types


ILI (INTp): 84% as likely as LIE.
LII (INTj): 70% as likely as LIE.
EIE (ENFj): 67% as likely as LIE.

I have to mention three important things I found in myself, and are definitely not helping in my self-awareness. I lead quite unhealthy regular life that puts me in constant feeling of being tired. Second thing is that I easily see the outcome of choosing an answer, resulting in my choice being too strongly influenced by identifying with features of particular type.

If there is any information you need, or questionnaire to fill just write. Also I have prepared few photos to upload for VI.
Welcome, davez!

You seem very Gamma NT to me, the Te is obvious. You begin by mentioning how you've tested, as 'proof', to gather facts and evidence. On the other hand, I usually see Alpha NT's jump into the theory, and begin by asking about information elements, etc. You seem to care more about personal experience/proof, and anecdotal information.

Pictures for VI would be good.

I'd guess ENTj.

1. Leading a 'quite unhealthy regular life' sounds somewhat like Si-POLR,
2. while 'easily see the outcome of choosing an answer' could possibly be Ni,
3. and finally 'After learning MBTI for month or two' seems very Ne-devaluing. In my experience, Ne-egos tend to be much more exact when identifying events along a timeframe. They might say "for 6 weeks I studied MBTI", or "2 months and 1 week", whereas you don't seem to find that detail as important.

But heck, that's just an answer after one post. If you want to know your type, post often, and your true nature/thought process will come out and be more evident.