Quote Originally Posted by anndelise View Post
Except that he argues that a person's level of confidence determines what is (or isn't) real.
In particular, that if a person is confident in their typing of person P as type X, that confidence level determines that person P is indeed type X, and there is no need to check for accuracy nor reconsider own view despite Person P (and many others) saying that type Y more accurately describes person P.

Yes, it might be true for that person, but that does not make it real, nor accurate.

I would think that a Te ego would argue that what is real, what is actually observable, is more accurate, and more important, than one person's level of confidence in their own personal understandings.
>committing the same mistake/preference she argues against