He's an ILI with a tendency to bleed Fi mobilising all over the place.

Ni Te > Ti Ne

L: He is capable of understanding complex systems and logical structures but to him it is more important that something is practically workable than consistent in its complexity. Rather than appealing to a system of principles and rules, he instead looks for efficient and reliable ways in which his abstract and far-reaching foresight can be fulfilled. Although easily able to discuss topics of a theoretical nature, he sees his time better spent on matters which can be empirically grounded. Indeed, he may view the world as an incredibly complex whole which cannot be fully categorised by theory. Rather than stick to a set of principles that do not change, he is more likely to criticise absolutism and deal with matters on a case by case basis, re-evaluating his informational outlook accordingly.
T: Although capable of great flashes of insight, he tends to not explicitly verbalise the products of his imagination but instead focus on what is logically explainable, readily systemising his findings and discarding those that do not align with his logical system. Instead of spending his time investigating the trends of the past and future, he prefers to focus on the more ready possibilities through which he can apply his logic. While focusing his efforts on clarifying his worldviews and opinions, he prioritises the theoretical consistency and clarity of the opinions themselves rather than the usefulness of those opinions at any given time. He carefully considers the consequences of his own actions but is less inclined to inform others on this unless they explicitly ask for it. When asked, he will try to explain his insight clearly without being cryptic.


For instance, he would heavily prefer Paragraph L over Paragraph T.