Define a socionics term briefly

[Korpsy Knievel]

Wonder who's clown are you, you sticky particle of glue? I do know, you're everyone's pet clown around here, running, bumping and hiding behind any one who's got more balls than you, you slag midget.

So ye, answer the question.

Contrary to your muddled "understanding", your supervisory overlord Popper claimed to have killed logical positivism and other induction-dependent, verificationist schools of thought with falsification. Pretty funny you were able to make Gilly back down by showing him your ignorant ass.

[Absurd]

Contrary to your muddled "understanding", your supervisory overlord Popper claimed to have killed logical positivism and other induction-dependent, verificationist schools of thought with falsification. Pretty funny you were able to make Gilly back down by showing him your ignorant ass.

I didn't make any one back down, I just asked if you're a positivist and what does Yockey have to do with that Reinin thread lungs posted. I didn't summon Gilly in this thread, I asked you a question - not my problem he appeared at a particular time, in a particular thread. As I like to say - collateral damage.

No need to bring other people in it and shield yourself with them. I've got armour piercing loaded anyway. And as for Popper, it looks like it didn't cross your mind I do not own any rights whatsoever nor go by something that I didn't make mine, so your, again, electric-eel-in-a-tank-before-serving-dinner-like behavior plus your pathetic attempts at finding something about me, are going to remain pathetic attempts.

That was question number one, which you dodged, and yes, logical positivism deals strongly with empiricism - it's actually a vulgar version of empiricism, but my question still stands, so oblige me with your abstractness.

[Korpsy Knievel]

I've only ever mentioned Yockey in this thread and no other, so you're just repeating a dumb question, and I see no sense in answering dumb questions. The rest of your post is more paranoid speculation and puffery which also fails to merit a response.

[Absurd]

I've only ever mentioned Yockey in this thread and no other, so you're just repeating a dumb question, and I see no sense in answering dumb questions. The rest of your post is more paranoid speculation and puffery which also fails to merit a response.

No shit, genius, and if you haven't noticed this is exactly the reason I asked, I didn't dream it out. Anyhow, there are no dumb questions, only dumb answers. Secondly, the rest of your post is you, projecting again.

Now I know the reason you're going to dodge it every time.

[Korpsy Knievel]

No shit, genius, and if you haven't noticed this is exactly the reason I asked, I didn't dream it out. Anyhow, there are no dumb questions, only dumb answers. Secondly, the rest of your post is you, projecting again.

Now I know the reason you're going to dodge it every time.

Dumb questions are those where the answer is already known, or those that are built on false assumptions stemming from idiocy and sloth. The only answers they deserve are dismissal and mockery. And so that's what you get. Cheers.

[Absurd]

Dumb questions are those where the answer is already known, or those that are built on false assumptions stemming from idiocy and sloth. The only answers they deserve are dismissal and mockery.

Very funny, I laughed my arse off, not. You can't answer a simple question, don't make it look you know it. Anyway, whatever kind of look you were going for, you missed.

[ashlesha]

I started off joking and then just rolled with it and tried . But if something works I don't know if it needs to be checked for coherency. As a general rule coherency and effectiveness probably go together. But maybe this has to do with te and ti being different sides of the same coin?

[Absurd]

Something doesn't have to be coherent for practical use as long it does the job, but hey, it's just me.

[Gilly]

30 seconds of internetting would have demonstrated that your pet clown just blerfpked up an undigested linguistic clot with zero truth value on your Ben Sherman.

Yes and I did that. I just didn't feel compelled enough to muster more meaningless bullshit.

[Gilly]

I don't have any business with you, as long you won't invent it, so careful with that double-edged sword, Gilly.

What can I say, business runs in the family.

Wonder who's clown are you, you sticky particle of glue? I do know, you're everyone's pet clown around here, running, bumping and hiding behind any one who's got more balls than you, you slag midget.

So ye, answer the question.

lol wtf

sticky particle of glue

slag midget

absurd you are my favorite.

[Absurd]

What can I say, business runs in the family.

And what family is that?

[Gilly]

And what family is that?

The one where k0rpsey fucks you in the ass while everyone else is in the next room eating dinner on fancy china

[Absurd]

The one where k0rpsey fucks you in the ass while everyone else is in the next room eating dinner on fancy china

And you're wearing slippers and blowing him after. Besides, the only thing korpsey can fuck is his own dog although I doubt anything would come out of it for he is like sperm that lacks semen. In other words, he is infertile.

So stick that "family" of yours up your arse - no worries -, you won't get pregnant no matter how many times you try.

I hate crap families that even aren't families to begin with, they're dysfunctional.

[Gilly]

And you're wearing slippers and blowing him after. Besides, the only thing korpsey can fuck is his own dog although I doubt anything would come out of it for he is like sperm that lacks semen. In other words, he is infertile.

So stick that "family" of yours up your arse - no worries -, you won't get pregnant no matter how many times you try.

I hate crap families that even aren't families to begin with, they're dysfunctional.

Ok, you can escape to the beach if you have to, but we will be waiting for you in the cold. Ready to fuck you in the ass.

[Absurd]

Ok, you can escape to the beach if you have to, but we will be waiting for you in the cold. Ready to fuck you in the ass.

That didn't make any sense whatsoever. Seriously, me no speakey Englesias.

[Gilly]

That didn't make any sense whatsoever. Seriously, me no speakey Englesias.

Is ok, espeak espanish?

[Absurd]

Is ok, espeak espanish?

Is not okay, I still don't speak moron.

[strangeling]

Wow. I suck at experience.

Joke?

[ashlesha]

reporting gilly and absurd for being boring.

[strangeling]

Seems flawed to say Te = what works, Ti = what's coherent. How can something work if it isn't coherent?

Better yet, if it's incoherent, how can anyone know that it works?

[Absurd]

reporting gilly and absurd for being boring.

You do not have anything to do, don't you? Anyway, report that "I know something, I won't tell" guy first

[Gilly]

You do not have anything to do, don't you? Anyway, report that "I know something, I won't tell" guy first

Huh?

[Absurd]

What do you want? Earth is full, go home.

[ashlesha]

Better yet, if it's incoherent, how can anyone know that it works?

By implementing it and getting results.

"you don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows"

[strangeling]

By implementing it and getting results.

"you don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows"

Right, but if there is no context for why it was appropriate or "right", then its outcome was purely accidental. You then didn't implement anything because you don't have any idea of what its implementation entails.

What I'm saying is, Te should at least have a transient coherency that explains a context. And that situation can then be reproduced and thus coherent within its context.

[ashlesha]

If it worked, it worked. And if it works consistently it will probably work again.

The rest is probably true but a technicality.

[HandiAce]

what is coherent?

And THAT is why LSIs can't stand me!

[strangeling]

If it worked, it worked. And if it works consistently it will probably work again.

The rest is probably true but a technicality.

And the same thing could apply then to Ti in the application of statistics.

How does something work?

Let me be frank,
Ti users often create logical models that can have nothing to do with immediate or concrete reality. For them, the construct is purely abstract, it does not have to work because it does not exist in the realm of causality. It's a superposition on causality.
Te users often deal with causal reality. Because of this, actions enter the structure of "what works" by supplying reasons for them.

ergo, what on earth are you getting on about here?

Also,

"you don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows"

is stupid because it could be argued as intuition anyway. Knowing which way the wind blows is an implied abstraction.

[Absurd]

And THAT is why LSIs can't stand me!

LSIs can't stand any one - don't browse this thread, squark. Anyway, every one knows LSI is an isnult in real world...

[strangeling]

Why does nobody ever seem to know wtf they are talking about here?

[strangeling]

answer the question.

[Absurd]

Why does nobody ever seem to know wtf they are talking about here?

answer the question.

I tried getting over myself but I'm just too awesome, so I dropped it. Oh, and stick to a democratic quadra, this is none of your business. See? I can act, too.

[strangeling]

I tried getting over myself but I'm just too awesome, so I dropped it.

I appreciate your honesty.

[Absurd]

I appreciate your honesty.

Problem is, I don't appreciate you nor want you around. Go back to gamma, twat.

[strangeling]

Problem is, I don't appreciate you nor want you around. Go back to gamma, twat.

[Absurd]

Shoo! Glue yerself to somebody else. I'm better off alone.

[strangeling]

I never left Gamma anyway. All these idiots seem to think I'm Alpha and I really don't care to change their minds, so Alpha sure, but it's wrong.

Anyway, carry on asshole,
Let the Absurd continue!

[Absurd]

Ye, blahblahblah, touching story, and every time you challenge me, I'm going to challenge you which means no matter how many times you feign ethics to your advantage, be it Fi/Fe, in this wonderful and not so very bright expose to the socionics nation, you're none.

And quit with calling me asshole, you don't even deserve to call me that. All I hear is asshole, asshole, statistics, statistics from you, grow up, you cunt.

That said, you boring wanker, I have a recent thread where you can do that stuff unto me. Oblige me. You don't have to turn every one I happen to be posting in into something that it is not.

I can link you one if you want. Start with:

Boring Monotonous Wanker,
Boring Groups For Boring People,
Monotonous Cover,
Monotonous Series,
Another Monotonous Channel,
Monotonous Monday Math,
Monotonous and Dull Adapter,
Oceans Beyond Monotonous Space.

After you're done, ask me for the real one(s).

[strangeling]

Ye, blahblahblah, touching story, and every time you challenge me, I'm going to challenge you which means no matter how many times you feign ethics to your advantage, be it Fi/Fe, in this wonderful and not so very bright expose to the socionics nation, you're none.

And quit with calling me asshole, you don't even deserve to call me that. All I hear is asshole, asshole, statistics, statistics from you, grow up, you cunt.

That said, you boring wanker, I have a recent thread where you can do that stuff unto me. Oblige me. You don't have to turn every one I happen to be posting in into something that it is not.

I can link you one if you want. Start with:

Boring Monotonous Wanker,
Boring Groups For Boring People,
Monotonous Cover,
Monotonous Series,
Another Monotonous Channel,
Monotonous Monday Math,
Monotonous and Dull Adapter,
Oceans Beyond Monotonous Space.

After you're done, ask me for the real one(s).

Stop replying to my posts with your antagonistic bullshit and I'll stop calling you an asshole. You challenged me first dipshit.

This

Why does nobody ever seem to know wtf they are talking about here?

wasn't even directly aimed at you, but the fact that everyone is so god damn vague and anyone who provides lots of information gets chewed out. It's stupid and it's annoying.

[ashlesha]

And the same thing could apply then to Ti in the application of statistics.

How does something work?

Let me be frank,
Ti users often create logical models that can have nothing to do with immediate or concrete reality. For them, the construct is purely abstract, it does not have to work because it does not exist in the realm of causality. It's a superposition on causality.
Te users often deal with causal reality. Because of this, actions enter the structure of "what works" by supplying reasons for them.

okay. supplying reasons for what? actions supply reasons for what works? odd wording.

ergo, what on earth are you getting on about here?

just making conversation. i lost track of the whole "define te and ti" thing at some point.

Also,

is stupid because it could be argued as intuition anyway. Knowing which way the wind blows is an implied abstraction.

nah, its something you see and feel. idk what you mean by "implied abstraction."