My best friend (I thought he was SEE, now I can see he is ESE) has always said that I was Chandler M. Bing, now he says I am Dr. Sheldon Cooper.
I suspect I am LII, instead of ILE.
Thoughts?
My best friend (I thought he was SEE, now I can see he is ESE) has always said that I was Chandler M. Bing, now he says I am Dr. Sheldon Cooper.
I suspect I am LII, instead of ILE.
Thoughts?
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp![]()
DCNH: Dominant![]()
--> perhaps Normalizing
![]()
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
I was very nerdy: now I'm just nerdy. Theoretically, I was like Sheldon and now I am more like Chandler. Although the Friends series is older than the Big Bang one, which is why my friend just "forgot" about Chandler and "embraced" Sheldon.
Well, my personality reminds my friends of those fictional characters: matching people and fictional characters is easy, I guess.
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp![]()
DCNH: Dominant![]()
--> perhaps Normalizing
![]()
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
Warm Regards,
Clowns & Entropy
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
I think Dr. Sheldon Cooper is LII with Si for his Hidden Agenda. I have seen Sheldon typed as ILE, but since he has all of these systems set up to fill his Si needs, it doesn’t look much like Si dual-seeking, as it would be for an ILE. It would seem that ILEs really appreciate SEIs noticing and helping to take care of Si stuff for them. Sheldon doesn’t seem to need that.
I am not as familiar with Chandler, but Fe for his HA does seem more likely than Si.
So is your HA Si or Fe?
By the way, I saw some of your ideas about romance styles in a thread called Random Ideas. Very interesting to think about.
I THINK THAT FICTIONAL CHARACTERS ARE NOT RELIABLE STANDARDS FOR TYPING YOURSELF OR OTHER PEOPLE. CHANDLER BING IS A SHIT EATER AND SHELDON COOPER IS A PRETENTIOUS HOLLYWOOD HIPSTER DOUCHE'S INTERPRETATION OF A NERD.
AND NOW, BACK TO THE DEBATES.
The end is nigh
Should I be laughing?
I think I should be.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp![]()
DCNH: Dominant![]()
--> perhaps Normalizing
![]()
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp![]()
DCNH: Dominant![]()
--> perhaps Normalizing
![]()
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.