Quote Originally Posted by WinnieW View Post
Yeah, I clearly see argumentative consistent behavoir from you.

Claiming you don't take Socionics as granted for sure and linking to a description of Socionics theory to back up your own statement.

Holy shit. It wasn't my intention to obtain a new highscore in thread derailment in this forum. Now I'm in an upper rank, I guess.



Yeah. Why not doing a poll about my type? The majority of the votes deceide what my type is.
As I stated in an other thread. Photo typing is unreliable.

How do you explain that a get along with SEI and ESE types really well?

----------------

Besides from this the confussion might also be the interpretation of the meaning of conscientiousness.

Internal judgement is more about consistency or invariance
External judgement is more about conscientiousness.
I don't care about doing a poll for you. I gave you my reasons. As for 'getting along with SEI or ESE' if they're typed correctly, any type that's well adjusted will get along with almost anyone. It's just another example of your poor Ne but instead Ni, you dissect the type descriptions to be literal.