Results 1 to 31 of 31

Thread: On the delusion of typology

Threaded View

  1. #26
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    17,948
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wacey View Post
    Are you talking about sociotype? Just another identity - we have to call a tree a tree, there is no other choice. Where is the problem in that? Use it for awhile, drop it when no longer nessasary.
    Spade is a spade to me and I'm not talking about sociotype, and I'm not raging against socionics, do not see a point in that in the first place. To me, it is the same, people who are against and people who are for, same boat, different opinion but still same boat. If it wasn't some other scenario, those people wouldn't be even here and just said "meh", and left. So they're a part of the whole to me, a cog, thinking they're going to tinker with it and it is going to sink. Well, true believers just tighten the screws seeing that and balance is achieved. So you all can rage all you want, for and against, for you all are wearing shackles that you put on yourself willingly and enjoy it.

    For example:

    Subject A: Socionics is bullshit,

    Subject B: Socionics is real,

    A+B = Socionics.

    Classic push and pull.
    Last edited by Absurd; 09-04-2012 at 09:57 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •