-
Empiricism has definitely quenched the amount of different branches scientific theory can take these days. Science today leans itself towards absolute fact, and things that are provable beyond doubt. Not that it's a terrible thing, but I feel it slows down innovation a good bit. Risky/non-profitable theorems are almost always discarded until they're the only option left. Scientists have to eat, right?
However, on that note, I can and will provide empirical proof that Socionics is something real and has a measurable impact on society. My wager is that the impact is actually far greater and has implications in way more aspects of life than we currently believe. Only once the numbers come in and more people are aware of their types can I actually prove this, though.
Everyone says the biggest obstacle is finding a way to measure/quantify someone's type. What if I told you that obstacle has already been overcome? I have the talent, am donating the time, and know how to get the money to take it further.
I know it sounds like a lofty claim and I'd love to back it up, but I can't give out any more information at the moment.
This thread has been very helpful so far. It's good to know how the community feels about the whole thing; even if you're not a professor everyone's voice is valuable.
As my project moves along I'll keep coming back to this forum for feedback and volunteers.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules