Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
Short details. They should express personal liking and to follow ethical rules (Fi), understand the things in the world complexly (Ne), to like effective ways to do something (Te), to respect comfort (Si) and be predictable (J). They should not be hysterical drama ones (Fe) or do "bad" things, not aggressive (Se), not reasoning too much (Ti), not kicking us to do something in time (Ni).
This is bs on such fundamental level I don't even know how to tackle this. While I believe it may prove statistically accurate, it is just a collection of very superficial manifestations of information metabolism at work, which the said IM can in reality give completely different outcomes providing background of past experiences, current circumstances and so on. An EII can become aggressive and may do it in such way that they will get support from their dual. At times, an EII may press others to do something on time and it may be in a way that won't bother the said dual or that they won't even notice. On the other hand, an IEI may appreciate comfort and show it in a way that won't do them any favors as far as an LSE is regarded.
It is a unique sequence of processing data - and how it interlocks with the respective sequence of processing on a dual's part - that does the trick, not this costume or make up you speak of.
Also, Fi in base function is not about following ethical rules at all. It is (among other things) about deep understanding of various aspects of moral questions. What one does with this insight is another matter entirely. Although yes, EIIs tend to favor doing what we deem right (don't most people?)

Quote Originally Posted by Sol
If you are near and pretty - you'll get it. It's easy with S-E types. Sometimes you may don't notice this.

This is probably true. *gives Sol a cookie*