Ryan's Type

[Ryan]

Hum a lot of what you write is out of perception of events however some things strike me like you notice the qualities of a type “LSE don’t make good psychologist” you identify people by groups (?)

I said according to socionics. I don't take it as gospel, but if I'm debating someone I'm going to bring relevant things that I don't necessarily believe in to prove a point.

"In professional sense, SHTIRLITS is suitable for work practically anywhere where work requires realistic knowledge, high qualification, and that implies responsibility. They make for excellent architects, designers, pharmacists, surgeons, stomatologists, businessmen, chemists, physics, publishers, and so forth. But it is best that they do not engage in psychology."

[Beautiful sky]

I said according to socionics. I don't take it as gospel, but if I'm debating someone I'm going to bring relevant things that I don't necessarily believe in to prove a point.

"In professional sense, SHTIRLITS is suitable for work practically anywhere where work requires realistic knowledge, high qualification, and that implies responsibility. They make for excellent architects, designers, pharmacists, surgeons, stomatologists, businessmen, chemists, physics, publishers, and so forth. But it is best that they do not engage in psychology."

Well those are only facts. I feel like you are ENFP

[Ryan]

Well those are only facts. I feel like you are ENFP

Are you sure?

[Beautiful sky]

Are you sure?

Or SLE I’m in between things right now

[Ryan]

Or SLE I’m in between things right now

Haha. Alright, take your time.