Quote Originally Posted by Director Abbie View Post
I have a family of six. Three Deltas, two Alphas, and a Beta. The Si-valuers may discuss whether a noodle tastes springy or whether something smells purple and the beta just thinks it dumb. s consider what the environment is whereas s consider their personal experience concerning the environment.

Ryene stated that black rice was weird. "Weird" is a word like "short" or "flat;" its meaning varies depending on who uses it and what they are comparing it to. Then Ryene compared the texture of the rice to other textures she was familiar with. That sure seems Si-valuing to me.
You are describing the properties of an object.

I explained it very simply. Rice = object
properties = it's texture, it's color, it's shape size.

These are close to exact descriptions

If I were to describe black rice, I would say something like, "I don't like it" (Fi value judgement), which she doesn't. And then I would say something like I like other options to my black rice. Then I would go on to say something like "I don't like it [again stating my personal sentiments] because it feels to me as though I'm eating worms."

I'm not describing the properties of worms, I'm simply stating that it tastes in a way familiar to something which produces awkward sensations.

Her post doesn't have any personal sentiments of Fi first, so how can she be Fi base?