She was definitely too thin at one period of time. But maybe she was under stress or something. And when you're small to begin with, you can lose just a small amount of weight and look too thin:
However, her general body type seems thin but healthy. Some people are naturally very thin, and for obvious reasons people with those body types are appreciated in the entertainment industry. But she seems normal, if on the thin side of normal:
Her hair is darker there too. But, while she's thin, it's just because she has a gamine build, not because she's too thin.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
whatever her type is, that video turned me off. for sure. but not because of a true IM, more because she's representin.
ILE
those who are easily shocked.....should be shocked more often
I never noticed her LSIness before!
I just watched her interview with Ellen Degeneres (IEE?) and John Stewart (ILE) and I could relate to her. Ellen was so cold towards her. I hate it when IEEs do that to me...they act like I'm such a bad person when I haven't even done anything to remotely deserve that kind of treatment. Then, they'll be pleasantly surprised when I'm polite and compliment them. I thought LSIs were supposed to be the narrow minded ones...argh.
LSI/SLE, I think.
lol yea, what people really mean is "I find curvy women attractive" or "I find thin women attractive"... of course the way its written above is different, its defining an expectation for a particular gender... its like telling a man, "real men have chest hair" or "real men don't use mosturizer" or "real men don't shave" or etc..... it can offend men to do this stuff. But really I've seen people do both before...
Keira - ENTP
I do believe that she's ISFp.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Some people say SLE but I'm not entirely sold. She could be IEI IMO.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
I don't know how you see this issue, but I think "grave-digging" some old thread is better than constantly making new ones with minimal content in the OP. Also, your question might be answered while you read through the old threads.
Some examples:
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...eira+Knightley
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...eira+Knightley
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...eira+Knightley
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...eira+Knightley
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
I approve this thread
SLE-Ti sx/sp
IEE
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp
DCNH: Dominant --> perhaps Normalizing
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
Introverted. Feeling. Se/Ni. I will go with ESI.
IP, xLI, probably ILI
I would be interested if anybody has more opinions about her type. I think she is definitely not XII or IEE, I also don't think she can be IXI, I don't understand why people keep typing her as ILI, maybe somebody could explain.
One of my friends look like her, I am also confused about her type, so I would appreciate if other people share their opinions about Keira's type.
I just looked at her pictures on Google images, and I'd say most of them look ESI to me.
On videos, she looks like she is expecting emotional feedback to me. I can be wrong but I thought that is because of super-id Fe. Morrissey is typed as ESI by some of the members here and I agree. Knightley doesn't seem remotely like him to me.
I think we look for our Creative from the environment because it is what we want to prove to others we are good at, so we have our eyes on the lookout for it for opportunities to both master it and flex it. This definition comes from Beebean model of MBTI, which calls the Socionics Creative function the "Parent" function, meaning what we look up to and aspire to. Does either Creative Fe fit your friend?
I can't stand her. Always reacted to her like she is awful. Possible kvarda thing. I'd say ESI.
Socionics -
the16types.info
That's what I thought! She emits way too much (4D) Fe to be an introvert (especially not Fe Ignoring).
One should keep in mind that a lot of "model" pictures are set up in such a way that the person is not supposed to smile and look aloof, probably because a lot of photographers/art is dominated by ESIs. She can pull off that "Fi look", but in interviews it becomes apparent that is not who she really is. She is actually quite goofy and animated.
ILI/IEE/IEI
Keira Knightley - Introverted
SEI
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html