Hugo's Test (improved)

[Hugo]

Thanks

[Creepy-Diana]

.

[Angel von Himmel]

This test doesn't work for me.

[Catholic Schoolboy]

Only because you have your own shitty test.

[Angel von Himmel]

Only because you have your own shitty test.

That doesn't work for me either, lol ...

[Catholic Schoolboy]

Tests don't work dear. Quit trying.

I will Never test the same over and over I am a moody creature, I am human and thus beyon tests, beyond "type".

[Angel von Himmel]

Hmmmm ... sounds about right.

[Kristiina]

Your proposed type is:
INTp

http://www.people.iup.edu/rdxm/ptest_results.htm?Type=2

Mhhh... I do keep testing INTp lately. It's summer and I have no plans... Although I am a bit unsure about my future, I'm not stressed. I'm relaxed and reasonably happy. I wonder what it all means...

Fe-PoLR would make sense, just like I've said before, but compared to Erkki, I'm very extroverted. ...there are many differences...

[DrDevin]

Your proposed type is: INTj

I have only ever tested as an INTj and these results remain consistent. I do believe some questions could be worded better at least for determining those of a similar type (to my own).

I found that this test works best picking words from both choices that read as though they should be bolded and contrasting them.

For example:

Enthusiastic. He has a wide range of powerful emotions. He is capable of staying true to the vision of his youth throughout his whole life. He creates his mood by himself and knows how to make it contagious for others. Emotionally fine, kind, compassionate.

[Hugo]

The last question, to choose between mirrors, might work better if based upon temperament rather than functions.

IP or EJ
IJ or EP

That's interesting. Could you explain it further please (including the temperament thing).

[Park]

I took it again today and got INTj. It was the last question:

To be or not to be? A serious person focused on global problems. Sees the world in dramatic, even tragic colours. Expects all kinds of trouble. He takes personal problems and addresses them on a global scale. Meanwhile he often also strives to give something back to mankind.

He takes pride in his influence with people, their love and respect, of his own popularity, gladly leads others. He is assertive, but distant in dealing with the objective world, mistrustful towards new scientific ideas and in general towards everything things objective, which he perceives as too impersonal. He feels much more confident and therefore has a clear conscience, only in the field of influencing people.

I don't relate to either one. I chose the first one because it sounded more neutral. Are they function related? Fe & Fi or something?

[Expat]

The last question, to choose between mirrors, might work better if based upon temperament rather than functions.

IP or EJ
IJ or EP

That's interesting. Could you explain it further please (including the temperament thing).

As we have already noticed, tests based on functional preferences - like yours and McNew's old huge test, as well as his new test based on quadras - tend to have difficulty differentiating between mirrors. Which makes sense. Mirrors have the same functions in the ego, super-ego, etc.

Yet, as we all know, and Rocky has pointed out, mirrors are also very different types. So it should be easy to differentiate them - and it is, fairly, if you meet them in person.

One chief difference between mirrors is the socionics temperament - EJ, EP, IP, IJ.

When reading descriptions, or meeting people personally, we often are in doubt whether someone is INTj, INFj, ISTj or ISFj; or ENFp, ESFp, ENTp or ESTp.

From the functional point of view, this makes little sense, but those types do have things in common in their temperament, their behavior.

This article by DarkAngelFireWolf69 puts them in the context of how they fit in socionics and MBTI:

http://www.typelab.ru/en/articles/DarkAngelFireWolf69-mbti.html

And this one by Filatova clearly defines the temperaments:

http://babelfish.altavista.com/babel...%2ftemper.html

Also, if you look at Sminlingeyes's threads in the Gamma forum, you can see how he centers his behavior patterns on the temperaments.

So:

IJ - stable-balanced
IP - perceptive-adaptive
EP- flexible-mobile
EJ - linear-promotive

It should therefore be possible - by focusing on behavior, rather than functions - to decide whether one is ENTj rather than INTp, since we all know that those two types behave differently.

[Hugo]

@Winterpark
Stage 3 doesnt work well. I'm going to improve the test.

@Expat
Thanks