I finally wrote a less complex socionics test - 20 questions
Here you go guys .... I feel a little frustrated with my inability so far to make tests that people can understand and yet not manipulate, so I wrote this test. Tell me what you think ... It is less complex and maybe slightly more manipulatable, but I suppose that is the point.
20 questions
http://socion.info/cgi-bin/NT.cgi
Have fun! Post Links!
I actually liked that test and it was accurate for myself. Some questions were still too "obvious" however (but not distractingly so).
I don't know about this.
http://socion.info/cgi-bin/NT.cgi?po...1&Q15=1&Q20=-1
"To become is just like falling asleep. You never know exactly when it happens, the transition, the magic, and you think, if you could only recall that exact moment of crossing the line then you would understand everything; you would see it all"
"Angels dancing on the head of a pin dissolve into nothingness at the bedside of a dying child."
this one did better ENFp.. still not right though
a suggestion... dumb it down a little, left me with the same impression I get from talking to a pompous college student.
http://socion.info/cgi-bin/NT.cgi?po...1&Q15=-1&Q20=1
Hmm... three INTjs get three different scores
http://socion.info/cgi-bin/NT.cgi?po...=1&Q15=1&Q20=1
All Hail The Flying Spaghetti Monster
Ehh ... that is sort of what I am ...Originally Posted by Bionicgoat
this one did better ENFp.. still not right though
a suggestion... dumb it down a little, left me with the same impression I get from talking to a pompous college student.
This one was closer atleast ...
Ehh ... that is sort of what I am ...this one did better ENFp.. still not right though
a suggestion... dumb it down a little, left me with the same impression I get from talking to a pompous college student.
.......
http://socion.info/cgi-bin/NT.cgi?po...1&Q15=-1&Q20=1
SO much worse.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
http://socion.info/cgi-bin/NT.cgi?po...&Q15=-1&Q20=-1
yeah, this test was weird. i had no idea what several of the questions were trying to ask and one question was repeated.
another thing-
i don't think its fair to represent Ne or Ni with spirituality, as you seem to be doing in several questions.
I got ISTj. http://socion.info/cgi-bin/NT.cgi? ...
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
I still think your old 320 question test was the best one.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Now I became myself again (INTp). But some of the questions were almost impossible to answer. The differences between various aspects of Body and Soul are very unclear and can probably be interpreted almost any way you like. I have no idea if I understand them correctly or not.
My result: http://socion.info/cgi-bin/NT.cgi?po...1&Q15=1&Q20=-1
asd
http://socion.info/cgi-bin/NT.cgi?po...1&Q15=1&Q20=-1
...Is this just an excuse to collect data about each of us?
[Stormy] [LII]
These questions made more sense to me than the previous. I'm thinking that perhaps the creative Ne makes me more eager for reform than the average delta.
INFp
INFj
"Wow."
I know. :/
"To become is just like falling asleep. You never know exactly when it happens, the transition, the magic, and you think, if you could only recall that exact moment of crossing the line then you would understand everything; you would see it all"
"Angels dancing on the head of a pin dissolve into nothingness at the bedside of a dying child."
It is FAIR to equate inutition with spiritualty, because without the abstract there would be no such thing as spirituality. Plus, the word spirituality in itself is not really supporting any specific religions or doctrines; maybe in the least a personal spirituality, which people of all faiths and non-faiths tend to have atleast to some degree.
agreed, but does that mean its fair to brand all intuition as spirituality? not at all.It is FAIR to equate inutition with spiritualty, because without the abstract there would be no such thing as spirituality.
i agree but this is not relevant.Plus, the word spirituality in itself is not really supporting any specific religions or doctrines; maybe in the least a personal spirituality, which people of all faiths and non-faiths tend to have atleast to some degree.
It might not be relevant, but it isn't enough to keep intuition from being equated with the spiritual aspect and also sensing with the physical aspect, as they both obviously are in comparison with oneanother.agreed, but does that mean its fair to brand all intuition as spirituality? not at all.It is FAIR to equate inutition with spiritualty, because without the abstract there would be no such thing as spirituality.
i agree but this is not relevant.Plus, the word spirituality in itself is not really supporting any specific religions or doctrines; maybe in the least a personal spirituality, which people of all faiths and non-faiths tend to have atleast to some degree.
EIE, ENFj, intuitive subtype.
E3 (probably 3w4)
Cool ILI hubbys are better than LSIs any time!
Old blog: http://firsttimeinusa.blogspot.com/
New blog: http://having-a-kid.blogspot.com/
UPDATED TEST! Now more dummy proof ... hopefully!
Nearly the same test as last time, except that there are some slight diffrences and I gave this one pop up definitons on all of the confusing words.
Hopefully this one is more dummy proof.
http://socion.info/NT2.htm
Dosnt help the fact I'm still testing INFp... I've never done that before.
http://socion.info/cgi-bin/NT.cgi?po...&Q15=-1&Q20=-1
http://socion.info/cgi-bin/NT.cgi?po...1&Q15=-1&Q20=1
same response as last time... same complaint as last time...
http://socion.info/cgi-bin/NT.cgi?po...1&Q15=-1&Q20=1
Hahaha.
Jesus.
What happend to my?
I sat and slowly thought about each question and got : http://socion.info/cgi-bin/NT.cgi?po...=1&Q15=1&Q20=1
All Hail The Flying Spaghetti Monster
Oyburger's type is test proof.
I guess you guys need to be looking more carefully at the definitions ... if you fly through this test quickly without studying the definitions, it is probably going to be off no doubt. I probably need to add something else to the test as well, couldn't hurt atleast.
ESTj
still got INTj.
one thing which may be affecting this is the sense of spiritual vs. phsyical, for which i answered all physical. this is because, as it is defined, the spiritual (of or pertaining to the spirit) doesn't make sense to me.
So you mean you want me to MAKE the test say INTp?
Oh, I could do that pretty easy. It's just that I'm not a sullen hard ass bitch like I was a few months ago and most of the shit that used to be true isn't true anymore. It's makin' me think socionics is shit.
No, I am saying that I think there are problems with people misunderstanding the questions.So you mean you want me to MAKE the test say INTp?
Oh, I could do that pretty easy. It's just that I'm not a sullen hard ass bitch like I was a few months ago and most of the shit that used to be true isn't true anymore. It's makin' me think socionics is shit.
I know english.
I'm INFp now.
http://socion.info/cgi-bin/NT.cgi?po...1&Q15=1&Q20=-1
"To become is just like falling asleep. You never know exactly when it happens, the transition, the magic, and you think, if you could only recall that exact moment of crossing the line then you would understand everything; you would see it all"
"Angels dancing on the head of a pin dissolve into nothingness at the bedside of a dying child."
I came out as ISFj .. What the fuck!
How the heck you guys are confusing T for F and F for T on this test is beyond me ...
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
