I finally wrote a less complex socionics test - 20 questions

[Catholic Schoolboy]

INFp

http://socion.info/cgi-bin/NTA5.cgi?...=-1&P=6&post=1

Heh.

Can people change type with moods?

[XoX]

First test that is able to give me NF or extrovert type However I had some trouble answering all questions reliably. I could have easily chosen different answers in many questions which would have changed the answer considerably.

http://socion.info/cgi-bin/NTA5.cgi?...=-1&P=6&post=1

Hmm...by changing one question I would be INFj. I still can't decide firmly on questions such as
A.) Your intent in reasoning is to narrow down multiple generalized specifics to give proof to a hypothesis of some sort.
B.) Your reasoning tends to be more open ended and exploratory, you rely on base assumptions according to the perceived stimuli you picked up from your senses.

I like the new kind of questions e.g. about eating chili dogs etc. They are fun Those "hypothesis blaa blaa" questions instead are typical test questions which are slow to read and hard to answer (at least for me).

[Angel von Himmel]

Based on the last test, except this one is guaranteed to round down to a 4 letter type [with Xs possibly]. Questions may vary on the last page depending upon how you answer the first 12 or so questions.

http://socion.info/cgi-bin/NTEST4.cgi

[vague]

[Ms. Kensington]

xstp. i seem to be testing s these days.

[oyburger]

http://socion.info/cgi-bin/NTEST4.cg...-1&Q20=-1&C=32

[Angel von Himmel]

It seems to not be calculating the E or the I very well ... I should check out why.

[Lover of the Pen0r]

Wot? I'm not xSTj, I'm ENFj, dammit!

http://socion.info/cgi-bin/NTEST4.cg...=1&Q18=-1&C=24

[April]

http://socion.info/cgi-bin/NTEST4.cg...=1&Q18=-1&C=24

Well, if it was calculating the E and I, it probably would have gotten the right type

[aestrivex]

http://socion.info/cgi-bin/NTEST4.cg...-1&Q18=-1&C=24

[Logos]

Likewise: http://socion.info/cgi-bin/NTEST4.cg...-1&Q18=-1&C=24

[Gilly]

http://socion.info/cgi-bin/NTEST4.cg...7=1&Q18=1&C=13

I thought it was shitty and convoluted at first, but it turned out to be not so bad.

[Catholic Schoolboy]

http://socion.info/cgi-bin/NTEST4.cg...=1&Q16=-1&C=16

[Angel von Himmel]

Hmmm ... apparently I have finally run into a format that seems to be working somewhat decently. It could probably go with some improvements now though.

[aestrivex]

i thought that a lot of the descriptions had nothing to do with each other at all.

[Angel von Himmel]

i thought that a lot of the descriptions had nothing to do with each other at all.

Yeah ... confusing isn't it?

[Logos]

I actually had trouble with the last section. Due to the way it was grouped, I thought that it was asking for the best description of myself in the A&B, C&D, E&F, or G&H categories. So I clicked through each one and I didn't notice that my answer choice was being moved. That's why I kept getting different results. Once I realized that my last answer was the description out of ALL A-H (1 or 2), I was able to get a more accurate test result.

[Jonathan]

XNTP
http://socion.info/cgi-bin/NTEST4.cg...=-1&Q20=-1&C=5

It's a very a creative test, like most of your tests. I have to laugh though when it says not to answer according to preconceptions, because it's very difficult to not to have preconceptions when the questions are all based on paragraphs built from Socionics descriptions.

What I find particularly interesting in this test is that it appears that you're employing an idea I've also had that I haven't seen stressed much in Socionics....namely that if, let's say, you're NF, you'll probably associate T with S and F with N, whereas if you're NT, you'll probably associate T with N and F with S.

But that's a hard concept to get reliably in a test. When you ask what "complements" what, some people may see that as asking for a correct answer about a statement of fact, rather than giving information about themselves. But I know what you're getting at, and it's a nice idea.

Another approach would be to phrase it like this....

"When you use [xyz]," are you most like to use it with a or with b....

For example....

When analyzing something logically, do you try to:
1) see all the hypothetical possibilities? or
2) take into consideration the clear concrete facts?

Are you most likely to express emotions when you're
1) in a comfortable atmosphere? or
2) contemplating the future?

....Not that my wording here is very good....but the general gist is what I'm talking about....Anyhow, it's just an idea.

[Benny]

XNFJ

[Ch4r]

XNTp

[Gilly]

XNFJ

Yeah, your buddy told us you were most likely an ENFj "Actor" type. He seemed pretty convinced. Does he know you IRL, this crazyfuck guy?

[Benny]

XNFJ

Yeah, your buddy told us you were most likely an ENFj "Actor" type. He seemed pretty convinced. Does he know you IRL, this crazyfuck guy?

No. Who the hell is crazyfuck?

[snegledmaca]

link

XNFP

[Expat]

http://socion.info/cgi-bin/NTEST4.cg...=1&Q20=-1&C=21

XNTj

[Gilly]

XNFJ

Yeah, your buddy told us you were most likely an ENFj "Actor" type. He seemed pretty convinced. Does he know you IRL, this crazyfuck guy?

No. Who the hell is crazyfuck?

I dunno, someone told me it was crazyfuck. Does anyone who ever come onto the chat know you IRL? Because this guy seemed like he did.

[SLeo123083]

INFj once again.

[Angel von Himmel]

Now that a bunch of you guys have taken the tests, I can tweek it a little and see if I can get something more accurate done with the I and E ... it seems to be showing up as X in that spot for alot of you.

[Kristiina]

I recommend less weed to be able to write better descriptions.
For example, "an estimation of an alignment of forces"
"Inferring relationships, noticing threads of meaning"
"Contingency plaiming, scheduling, and quantifying."


PS! I like the fact that people make tests, but this test has the worst options ever! Especially the longer ones in the beginning.

My result:
XNTJ

Erkki:
XNTP