Please, PROVE ME WRONG
Please, PROVE ME WRONG
ILI (FINAL ANSWER)
Socionics and my quest to reconcile the two systems which may not even be possible
ILI (FINAL ANSWER)
I see, I say this only because I related to the MBTI INTP descriptions in the past, but the ILI socionics descriptions not as much.
Anyways, I think LII fits you better as you seem to give off Alpha vibes to me as opposed to Gamma vibes. / over / seems likely from reading your posts imo.
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
Another expert has fallen. You socionics gurus drop like flies.
ENTp, Socially introverted.
I always thought you were ENTp crispy.
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...nd-troubles-us
Originally Posted by Article
lol @ my exact situation. Strange that they said it arised from the LSI mask but very interesting. Looks like I'll have to attempt to figure out what extroversion/introversion RLY means.
ILI (FINAL ANSWER)
On these forums and elsewhere Ni tends to monopolize the realm of intuition and Ne is left with everything dumb, comedic, pop-culture-esque, etc. That could be what you have been suffering from.
Also, you probably relate to both irrationality/intuition and Ti ego, right?
Very much yes, but extroverted? ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
And "dumb"/comedic/whatever sounds like me too
ENTp may be more likely than INTp but only if I don't have any idea what extroverted means. I already don't know what socionics Rationality/Irrationality means so guess it wouldn't be surprising. Noone knows any ISFj's who are "underachievers"?
ILI (FINAL ANSWER)
You sound Ti to me as far this alien theory is concerned.
LOL I remember showing Aleksei this exact quote with the same bold to try to convince him that he was ENTpILE Logical subtype (The Selector)
Victor Gulenko
Self-centred and pensive. Their ideas do not have direct connection with reality, for example philosophy, religion, bioenergetics etc. Their favourite occupation is comparing different logical systems. A type of office scientist. A very slim figure is characteristic for them. Angular in their movements, does not pay attention to external appearance, worry little about their health.
Someone tell me I can't be extroverted.
ILI (FINAL ANSWER)
I see little to nothing Ti in Crispy's activity; he is all about data compilation, correlations, statistics. I see little to no interest in analysis and structural pattern matching.
Very much yes, but extroverted? ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwNoone knows any ISFj's who are "underachievers"?Fe valuesLOL I remember showing Aleksei this exact quote with the same bold to try to convince him that he was ENTp
I've always gotten Ne/Si vibes from you.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
I'm going to masterbate to this thread later.
<Crispy> what subt doesnt understand is that a healthy reaction to "FUCK YOU" is and not
That's the spirit!
ILI (FINAL ANSWER)
Hahahahaha that was one of the big reasons I was hesitant to consider anything else but I decided a Filatova mistyping wouldn't be completely unpossible. Need better temperament descriptions stat!
ILI (FINAL ANSWER)
Make me
Looking for an Archnemesis. Willing applicants contact via PM.
ENFp - Fi 7w6 sp/sx
The Ineffable IEI
The Einstein ENTp
johari nohari
http://www.mypersonality.info/ssmall/
Behavioraly you'd be one strange ILI if you were one.
Easy Day
At this point leaning LII > ILE but fit both pretty well. Still can't see self as extrovert even after concentrating on only socionics descriptions of intro/extroversion
ILI (FINAL ANSWER)
No.
You are affectionate, adorable and playful. Just like an alpha. You are also cute and ambivalent.
A Gamma is inherently more serious and biting. Even the esfps, who I get along on great with.
Not an ILE though cuz you lack the Fi polr sort of assholeness. Though you can be ass-y at times. just not in the fi polr way, bah.
I'm curious what caused this identity crisis of sorts?
Big 5's Conscientiousness dichotomy + my perception of ESI as High conscientiousness + obsessive compulsive need to combine all the type theories + major confusion over socionics judging/perceiving
Pretty much just discarded socionics descriptions, functions, and inter-type relations in favor of dichotomy match-ups, only because I find them simpler to work with. But the big picture descriptions seem to work better in the long term.
ILI (FINAL ANSWER)
They actually do "match up" fine. Depending on what fine means.