@Galen -- so types look plasticy? >.>
@Galen -- so types look plasticy? >.>
And I would hide my face in you and you would hide your face in me, and nobody would ever see us any more.
Just saw the male faces. First reactions:
When I clicked on 7, I cringed and closed my eyes, then quickly scrolled away. Yuck.
8 is pleasant and a nice face to look at, I can stay there for awhile. Whereas 7 made me want to get away as quickly as possible, I have the opposite reaction with 8 - where I want to study his face more.
9 -- ew, more an unpleasant disgust. Not as bad as 7 - but not good.
10 no reaction. it's okay
11 - gahhhh, get me away!
12 just makes me laugh. He looks ridiculous, as in over-exaggeratedly friendly, but not a bad face.
4 then 1 for the women... 4 is highly attractive. For the men only 9 seemed to have any appeal at all... most seemed really off.
Now this is a story all about how, my type got changed, turned upside down. Just wait for a minute and watch chatbox right there, & I'll tell how Gem became the moderator with blue hair.
In typology central friended and praised, on the picture thread was where she spent most her days. Chilling out, selfies, relaxing all cool, And all typing some people and getting them schooled.
When a couple of girls who were up to no good, Started annoying her & her friends in the forumhood, She got in one little flame war & got pissed off & said 'I'm moving in with that exboyfriend in the forum with the socionics toffs.
So Gem pulls up to the forum for a year without being a hater, And yells to typocentral 'Yo creeps! Smell Ya later', Became a mod in her kingdom she was finally there, To sit on her throne as the mod with blue hair.
InvisibruJim
Originally Posted by fen
So/So/So that one.
Yes
This is an interesting idea that I haven't seen performed before.
There is a danger here that you are using averages which tend to create 'beautiful people' because average qualities do that.
It would be worthwhile doing more than correlation, 'These are average face composites for 5', by expanding to include ideas such as Enneagram 5s/6s iconoclastism and how this impacts appearance versus the attraction flaunting 7s/3s.
I certainly don't find the so > sx composites to be particularly attractive. Even if this was the case, how is this a bad thing?
So just create random type combinations? I don't see much worth in doing that unless I were to go with the various triads, which may be worth checking out.
Okay. Now sex.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Noooo, more or less defining the types of lifestyles/mannerisms enneagram types lead and how this may affect appearance.
You can create as many lifestyle/mannerism delineations as you want between any combination of enneatypes, so it'd be more effective to just go ahead and make combinations of everything.
I wonder that too.
[]
| NP | 3[6w5]8 so/sp | Type thread | My typing of forum members | Johari (Strengths) | Nohari (Weaknesses)
You know what? You're an individual, and that makes people nervous. And it's gonna keep making people nervous for the rest of your life. - Ole Golly from Harriet, the spy.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote