Standard V.I. fallacy.
Standard socionics visual identification is extremely biased towards white, or caucasian europeans. V.I. is tantamount to palm reading. It also fails to account for children and the elderly. The posted pictures illustrate my point. I know this topic has been over done,- I really feel if socionics is going to survive it needs to cut the fat.
I would include more, just want to keep the post small. Can there be some middle ground, when it comes to deciding a persons sociotype based on how they move, or what their facial structure is shaped liked? Or even the facial espression one habitually makes?
Reply With Quote