Discuss.
Discuss.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
SLI
/thread
"We have no compassion and we ask no compassion from you. When our turn comes, we shall not make excuses for the terror.".
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
I think you're SLI, but if you aren't you could be SEI. You seem warm to me, and SEIs often seem laid back like SLIs but really warm. But maybe the warmth I notice is just some duality thing. Anyway, probably SLI.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
SLI
you remind me a lot of my brother. I base his typing off yours...and there's no way in hell he is SEI.
I like SLI as well, I tend to relate positively overall to you but it doesn't seem like duality or like an SEI. Delta makes sense as well.
I think we all need to see a video of you.
Socionics -
the16types.info
By reading the discriptions of the SLI, I type my asshole brother as one. However, none of the SLIs here on the 16types seem to be the class A prick that my brother is. I am wondering if maybe he is LSI, but anyway, since I have nothing else to go on, I accept the prevailing group think about people's types.
EDIT: I don't want to highjack Park's thread, but I never read the type discriptions on this site, only the wikisocion ones. My brother seems less a SLI than LSI by these disciptions on this site... Park is set free, not guilty of being my dickhead brother!
Last edited by Saberstorm; 06-12-2012 at 05:51 AM.
Socionics -
the16types.info
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
delta SLIme jk
i think sli, if we go to into subtypes, accepting may be more likely to me.
SLI-
I agree with Si-SLI.
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
I made this one the other night.
Why Si subtype?
Last edited by Park; 06-12-2012 at 08:48 PM.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
Because you seem more outwardly emotional, less "rational" in terms of being categorical in your thinking or deliberate in your mode of self-expression. Alpha>Gamma vibes in general; I think there is definitely something to the fact that a number of people have mentioned SEI as a possibility for your type over the years, although since coming to know you more personally I find it a totally bogus suggestion. I can understand why it gets thrown out there, though.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
Your Fe PoLR is quite remarkably apparent on the forum from experience; Ne DS is right on the money in terms of how you relate with IEE on the forum and they with you.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Maritsa baby, thanks for sharing your opinion. It means so much to me, you can't even imagine. But may I humbly ask you a favor? Would you stop hitting on me, please? I don't want to live near you, nor benefit from your activation.
On another note, would you mind sharing where your sister lives?
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Dang.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
Nonono nothing that personal, I mean you just strike me as very natural and easy-going, not really ummm, composed or
Well certainly not IEI, mostly for the same reasons that you are not SEI plus you strike me as uber-Judicious, and LSI, well, again you fit the Judicious stereotype, and I don't see much Fe seeking or IJ rigidity in your demeanor.How about IEI? Or LSI for that matter?
You're a tough nut to crack, actually; I usually have an easier time spotting E-type than Socionics, but you are one case where the opposite is definitely true. I think there are definitely elements of 4-ness in your internal attitude, but overall you strike me as a Gut triad type more than a Heart type, mostly because you seem pretty confident in your own identity and give absolutely zero fucks whatsoever what other people think of you 9w8 or 8w9 seem most likely, I lean 8w9: you are very driven and you have a hard edge to you, but are also very laid back and easy-going. You do seem to be a reactive type. I would normally consider 6 because you don't seem like a typical 8 outwardly, they are often very sociable and gregarious, but Head triad doesn't fit as well as Gut IMO and I just don't get the same sense of inner wavering, you strike me as being actually rather single-minded and you don't really doubt yourself much, and not with the same sense of outright rejecting the odds that you are wrong like a cp6 does. I used to think you were a 6 until I started getting to know you better; your brand of reactivity is, as I've come to see, very similar to Absurd who I think is also an 8w9 but you don't have the sense of measuredness and knowing your place that Absurd has, mostly due to being irrational whereas he is rational. You also tend to show your affection by giving active assistance to people and slowly working up to a position where you feel comfortable being vulnerable, a stereotypical sign of 8 integration to 2.Oh, and what about enneagram?
You do not strike me as having the very deep, underlying sense of being flawed that 4s do. I think you have a 4 fixation moreso than 2 or 3, and I would say 4 is your Heart fix, probably 4w3 because of your somewhat professional bent and lack of disheveled hermit-ness, but with you it seems less of a deep, personal issue, and more than you are just kind of like "Ehh, I guess I'm fucking weird...*resigned shrug*" which is exactly what 8s and 9s do I would say your head fix is probably 6w7, you have a very genuine fun-spiritedness about you and are less super-pensive than 6w5 fix people strike me, but I think triple reactive makes sense, and you can be very playful, lighthearted, and camaraderie-oriented when the mood takes you.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
yeah. 8/9 over 4 for certain. And yeah, no way on the Fe.
IEI-Fe 4w3
Yeah I'm really leaning 8 for park after getting to know him a little better, and he shares a lot of similarities in his internal workings and mindset with my mother, LSE-Si 8w7 sp/sx, and a former friend of mine, LIE-Te 8w9 sp/sx.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
You had to ruin it and go at my Fi, now didn't you, shitface? Not sure if I wanna marry you anymore.
LOOK AT ME I AM GILLY AND I UNDERSTAND EVERYONE... fucking image-oriented 3s.
If it talks like a whore and acts like a whore, it is a whore.
Not with that attitude.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
I don't actually get to know everyone though...
*sparkle*LOOK AT ME I AM GILLY AND I UNDERSTAND EVERYONE... fucking image-oriented 3s.
If it talks like a whore and acts like a whore, it is a whore.
Yeah I'm a lazy bitch. I stubbornly resist, on principle, shelling out half a million dollars in order to "learn" what I have already taught myself and fulfill my calling in a sterile, half-assedly Freudian office, when I can actually have fun with those 8 years and the rest of my life, and do my job from the comfort of my bed.Not with that attitude.
I just have to have a second job and settle for less money
Last edited by Gilly; 06-13-2012 at 02:50 AM.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Park and Gilly are getting along
Park is definitely SLI
If Gilly is supposedly EIE, they would therefore be conflict relations.
Ergo
Gilly must not be typed correctly....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odK20vQB-7o
Last edited by Red Villain; 06-13-2012 at 03:22 PM. Reason: misspelling of "Is"
"We have no compassion and we ask no compassion from you. When our turn comes, we shall not make excuses for the terror.".