I may have posted pictures of women whom I find to be attractive in this thread before, but I don’t think I stated what physical features I find attractive.
I’ve often said I prefer thin women, but they are thin only in comparison to the modern average. I actually like women with just the right amount of fat, in the right places, on a strong, healthy frame. “Strong and healthy” are incredibly sexy characteristics.
Insofar as intelligence can be seen in a woman’s face, it is also a physical feature I like. As is a nice, warm smile.
Beyond those things, I don’t have strong preferences. I’m sometimes surprised at how different the women I’ve gone out with look. They all have some things in common, though.
I like a woman who is intelligent, strong, and healthy, with a kind smile. Good taste in clothes (clean lines, flattering styles that fit well, and a certain talent for color) are a big bonus.
The face. I forgot to mention the face.
A lot of women have really beautiful and objectively attractive faces. But I don’t find all of them subjectively attractive. A woman might be world-class beautiful and I won’t give her a second thought if she doesn’t have the “right” face, and I can’t tell you what that “right” face looks like, except that I know it when I see it.
Some of this preference might be innate and some might be training. Some women have faces that, when I see them, cause me to abandon all logic and fully prepare to entirely forgive her for wrecking the car or burning the house down by accident. I think this must be hard-wired into my lizard brain somewhere, because it doesn’t make much sense otherwise.
Last edited by Adam Strange; 07-30-2019 at 04:38 AM.
A broad, genuine, warm smile.
Bright, warm, medium eyes.
Thin, straight eyebrows that move upward from the center out.
Focused, playful and seductive expression.
A smooth, heart-shaped face.
Medium length hair, styled with bangs.
Warm, pastel colours in clothing, without ornament and affectation. Feminine, dresses and skirts not pants.
Natural scent and body hair, not too much perfume.
Well, maybe not Fe. Lol.
@xerxe, I work with a woman who looks a lot like the one in your first pic. I type her SEI. But she's married.
Im very fond of the buttholes of fit women. One might even call it an anal fetish.
"The society that separates it's scholars from it's warriors will have it's thinking done by cowards and it's fighting by fools." ―Thucydides
Shorter, yet thicker and more turgid.
I've liked all colors of coloring and such, I tend to gravitate toward a certain dark-haired type, but I've also liked blonde dudes.
I like chests and shoulders too
Height isn't a huge factor to me even though I'm on the tall side. I actually like when a dude is close to my height (5'8"), just slightly taller usually
When they’re black lol <3
And I'm what you desire, like a siren in the night
Originally Posted by Starfall7w6 2w3 8w9 - The Free Spirit
There is no set of eyebrows, row of teeth, or pair of eyes that, taken by themselves, do much to attract me. Before I can begin to feel attracted to someone, I need to see entire constellations of features. It is in the whole that emerges from the parts, not in the parts that emerge from the whole, that attractiveness lies.
Type me here: http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...nnaire-(Nunki)
Posture, grace, health/hygiene go a long way!
I rarely feel alone. I rarely talk to anyone, yet in my head i have the most amazing, the most fantastic discussions with the people in my life. In real life, what most people talk about is several orders of magnitude lesser than their inner experiences. Most people never reveal the singularity of their subjective experience.
Maybe I should learn to explore other people's consciousness. Maybe I should aim for a real space between me and others. Instead of cultivating monologues and fantasies. It's hard, but the alternative to this seems to be madness. ~ lkdhf qkb
Life is soup. I'm fork
Compact but slim body. Light bone structure. Girl-next-door look. Not too much make up. No tattoos please. Approachable and nice personality. Normal in the best sense of the word, with a hint of feminine mysticism.
A true sense-perception certainly exists, but it always looks as though objects were not so much forcing their way into the subject in their own right as that the subject were seeing things quite differently, or saw quite other things than the rest of mankind. As a matter of fact, the subject perceives the same things as everybody else, only, he never stops at the purely objective effect, but concerns himself with the subjective perception released by the objective stimulus.
(Jung on Si)
In dating people recently again I’ve noticed that I find both really big and really small kind of unattractive. Approximately the same size as me is the best to me.
I'm open to all types I think, but I prefer the same height as me cuz it's the most fun/easiest to kiss. It's one of those things where I don't think same-ness "clashes." In fact I kind of supervise some relationships in the sense that some people always think two similar things will always 'not work' or be 'no charge' like putting batteries in backwards or something but I don't think it works quite that way in people. (I get what they mean tho of course, you probably wouldn't want somebody exactly like you -- but they go overboard with the opposites attract thing and then don't attract compatible people because of it.)