I guess we're doing picture examples? Haha.
I guess we're doing picture examples? Haha.
Last edited by Contra; 02-17-2016 at 06:13 AM.
Ditto. I actually had a thing with two different girls in a two month timeframe that both tested SEE and both looked like this girl. Then, same place, I saw two more girls that looked like this (actually mistook one for the second girl I was seeing). I think it must be a thing for SEE girls to try and look like the exact same person for some reason.
Here, penciling/tatooing eyebrows is wayyyyy too common
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Takeshi Kaneshiro.. The sexiest, out of this world, dude ever. Kyaaaaaaaaa
Last edited by Pink; 03-01-2016 at 05:36 AM.
They all look the same to me
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Attachment 7215 mmmhmmm
Looks like Justin Timberlake
@Maritsa, two girls I was attracted to back in high school...
*Removed for the sake of their privacy*
Last edited by Resonare; 03-29-2016 at 08:12 AM. Reason: Privacy
Last edited by Kalinoche buenanoche; 03-28-2016 at 08:58 PM.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Anyway @Maritsa, the first one looks like an INTp to me, though I guess you could argue ESFp as well...
I can verify that she was definitely Gamma and gave off a bit of a victim vibe.
But the second one I posted is some kind of Ne/Si valuer (probably ESFj) so I'm not sure where you got INTp from...
Last edited by Resonare; 03-29-2016 at 08:13 AM. Reason: Privacy
I can't say for sure
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
So, apparently Gammas smile like those pics because they have nice teeth but they are just really big. This correlates to alpha, who have Closed Mouth Complex because of their nasty teeth. Maybe Alphas need braces. Then they could be Gammas.
The way you just wrote just "INTp." made me think you were sure.
Mate, I have a pretty bad set of front-bottom teeth which gives me a pretty large overbite.
I've already told @Maritsa to remove it from her quote.
I planned to remove it yesterday but the ILI accusation made me curious of what @End and @Contra will think about them.
Oh I was using her logic to show how flawed it is.
Example: If you got braces and your teeth were fixed to perfect, you would smile more and your chin would stick out to a different amount. Maritsa would then see your different face and type you differently. That which was supposedly decided from birth, the TIM, is now changed.
the first one strikes me as IxFx... leaning Se/Ni and more rational, but i mean, i don't really know. She *could* be ESFp. just impressions.
I don't really depend on VI a whole lot. It's interesting to see certain consistencies between types, but i don't use it for much else.
(Btw, that girl i posted who you compared to the ESFp benchmark girl seems more ENFp, or at least Ne/Si, just from her instagram, which i managed to find.)
@Resonare, types are like stereotypes. There are things you notice but in the ultimate end you can't really lay down any iron-clad laws in regards to things like appearances. People who are in the same quadra will appear to be, well, the same. / and / will appear very similar to the untrained eye. Yet in the end, given enough data, the differences become quite obvious. Yeah, they both LOVE how the other pretty much perfectly compensates for their own shortcomings yet in the end, well, we're all just searching for someone to compliment and compensate for our weakspots. types really like the types because, end of the day for example, each one is what the other really needs to *really* get the ball rolling.
What use is strength without foresight? What use is foresight without the strength needed to overcome the potential barriers that would deny you despite your clear and amazing vision? What use is it to win a battle yet lose a war?
ISFj is an interesting shout. I figure that girl is probably my dual and I've recently considered the possibility that I could be ENTj Normalizing.
Uh huh, you "managed to find" her account
Same, I only believe in this stuff to a certain degree. The only psychometric system I place a lot of faith in is enneagram because I am a big believer in the influence fear plays in our motiviations and behavior in general.
Yeah but I'm not actually weak in any of my valued functions . I type as ISFj only because the descriptions match me the most out of the Gammas and using Ni-Te requires more effort than Fi-Se.
Fear and motivations are within Socionics as well, though. For example, I consciously fear hurting people (Se-), and unconsciously fear not being effective (Te-). Because I am motivated to create relationships between people (Fi+) so that everything will run smoothly (Te-/Si+), I necessarily must force myself into other's psychological space (Se-). Such is, to quote Ashura, the dual nature of man; the human heart is a contradiction. In my case, my primary directive is to bond these limitless contradictions. Blah blah blah. Ahhhhh blah blah. Blah blah blah. Blah.
Requiring more effort equals Mental, as Vital is automation. Requiring more conscious thought equals Vital, as Mental is the default conscious thought. Requiring more equals Weak, as Strong is more efficient. Gotta place em all together into a coherent framework of situations.