-
Overall it sounds SEI > ESE.
That said, some of the descriptions are pretty messed up and the rest are severly lacking in content - except for Si and Fe, which are.. okay. Your Te is more like Ti. Ti sounds like bits of Ni and Ti. You said nothing about Ne, but the last sentence points to SEI/SLI in particular, and I'm being a little nitpicky here: wanting a consisntent exposure of Ne or "change" is related to having Ne as a fifth function. Ni is well.. pretty limited. And you do not sound like Ni-polr. ESEs simply will not hurry people to do things and do not like being rushed themselves either. Your concept of the eighth function is pretty funny but far from the truth, although the bits about Se mostly fit.
Did you hit your head or something? Your understanding of the theory became way worse than it used to be.
There is something I don't understand about you though. If your dauls are LII/ILE then these two do not give unsolicited advice or insist on following it (which sounds like Te btw), even though they are pretty good at it. Why do you want to do the opposite? Especially since you seem to have asked for technical help in multiple occasions and you were quite selective about it (like only listening to Krig).
In fact, I'm pretty sure at this point that whatever I advise you will not be considered. I understand not wanting to be influenced but you cannot keep asking for people's input and yet completly disregard what they tell you, and you have done it - yes, consistently.
AAAAAAAAARGGH. This post is way more negative than I hoped. I guess I don't need to tell you to ignore it if you don't like it.
Last edited by Ryan; 05-17-2012 at 07:15 AM.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules