As soon as I get out of college I'll find an island and create an anarcho-capitalist society, happy?

As I've said before, if people want a state, they will get one. Citing the existence of the state as its reason for being there is silly and unproductive. Everything that exists is natural, and yes has arisen over time, but so what? ******'s regime was natural, but should we advocate such a model? Seriously, what do you want, a five year plan for anarchism? The entire point is that I can't tell you how things will be organized except generally. If I was able to tell you, then why not have centralization?

Just remember, your ideal state won't last forever, someone will change it. Once the idea of state power is legitimate, it will be continuously extended to more and more spheres. There is no balance between master and slave. Once someone can say, "because I said so" the wheel forever turns in that direction.

Basically, you are claiming that I could be arguing any point as long as it's yours. Otherwise, I'll need to write a book detailing exactly how I'd personally bring it about. You on the other hand, can make any claim you want without backing it up because "supposedly" your statist philosophy has all the ready evidence of its "success" at hand. In truth, you merely describe what already exists without offering any model, and further you misshapenly describe it in the first place. Stop playing the status quo card: What you believe to be the case isn't even anyway. Give me a model or some theory. Tell me how state power will not be abused, or tell me how its abuse is better than the alternative.