Yup. Love me some J Lawz. People with downs are great. I don't know what it is about them, but they tend to have incredibly magnetic personalities. They're just so genuine.
Yup. Love me some J Lawz. People with downs are great. I don't know what it is about them, but they tend to have incredibly magnetic personalities. They're just so genuine.
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
Leelee Sobieski is my Jennifer Lawrence.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
OOoooh, she's so done to earth, I feel like she is one of us. o_O
Man, I got to say SEE, I don't see how there could be any other option.
There are literally 100 such videos, and they are all different.
Last edited by wacey; 03-16-2014 at 06:01 PM.
I love her and I wanna hit town with her. Before listening to her interviews I was actually sure she was IEE, but yeah, SEE seems more likely.
Mmmm...she a pretty young thing. I'd like to go deep inside of dat. She gon' feel the wrath of gawd when I stick my mushroom tip in.
She seems genuine enough but a bit too uncouth for my liking.
Idk. I haven't read that much on her. I will go with IEE-Ne, for now. Si-suggestive? Fe-demonstrative? Imo often plays SLI's in her films.
EDIT
- Jumps from idea to idea in interviews
- Has a more rapid firing of statement things going on (most seen in her sense of humour)
- General lack of external surrounding awareness (lots of stories of her clumsiness)
- sounds like a more heady overexcibale Ne thing with general feeling of lacking in sensing groundedness in some moments, but she is also described as general down to earth (like with eating and body image) so I believe it’s Ne/Si working together with her. When Ne is not enough stimulated (general exploring of the surroundings/ideas firing) she is not really feeling fully engaged mentally and it starts to act up internally as anxiety and feeling of constrainedness. Keeps the chargeness of the situation therefore always up in order not to get slowed down in the head, hence this rapid firing, jumping around with statements, saying things completely out of the blue, how they just come into her head/she discharges some heady inruition energy and it's very external/Ne - very in the moment wired with intuition. Too much Si and she feels constrained, not enough stimulized. Enough Si and she is grounded. It's a feeling of internal sensing groundedness, like she feeling comfortable in herself.“My body and my brain have never connected … I feel like I belong on another planet with different gravity.”
"I had to have running training because I'm not a very good runner. I run weird... The hardest stunt is probably basic running. And trying not to hit myself in the face with my bow, are my two greatest challenges."
“She’s terrible at walking,” “I am constantly surprised by how much she falls down without trying at all."
exceptional, excitable, hot-wired kids are often misunderstood and full of anxiety. Lawrence herself was so anxious that her parents found her a therapist. “I was a weirdo,” she says. “I wasn’t picked on or anything. And I wasn’t smarter than the other kids; that’s not why I didn’t fit in. I’ve always just had this weird anxiety. I hated recess. I didn’t like field trips. Parties really stressed me out. And,” she adds, “I had a very different sense of humor.” I ask Lawrence how that manifested itself in, say, junior high. She launches into several tales as examples. Like the time she decided it would be funny to jump out of the emergency exit of a moving school bus;
My nickname was ‘Nitro.’ I was hyperactive, curious about everything,” “When my mother talks about my childhood, she always says there was a light within me. When I went to school, this light went out.”“We never knew what it was, a kind of social anxiety,” reveals the Catching Fire star. “I went to see a shrink, nothing worked.”That is, nothing until she found her calling.“One day, I begged my parents to take me to a casting,” she told the magazine. “We went off to New York and that’s where I started acting. On stage, my mother saw the change taking place in me. She saw my anxieties disappear.” Acting, adds Lawrence, “made me happy because I felt capable whereas before I felt good for nothing. This is why mom fought for me to become an actress.”
- also general in line with this Ne roaming around and having to take a pause to recharge."The flip side is that more than one person I spoke with about Lawrence worried aloud that she’s working too hard. “Just for her sanity, I personally wish she would slow down a little bit,” says Francis Lawrence (no relation), who directedCatching Fire and in October will begin shooting the final two Hunger Gamesfilms in Atlanta, back-to-back. “I think that going from one set to the next to the next will eventually take a toll. I hope at some point she gets some time off.”
- seems also in line with Ne general having to take ever<thing in not missing anything out and more in a heady/creative exploration way, with the cost of tuning out internal bodily needs."More than any other young actress in recent memory, Lawrence also seems to have an almost compulsive need to take full advantage of every opportunity that comes her way. “I couldn’t say no,” she says. “And then when I was on set, I was like, ‘This is so much more important than a vacation. It’s so much better for my brain to be creatively stimulated in this way.’ It reminded me: This is what I love.”
Last edited by Moonbeaux Rainfox; 10-06-2016 at 06:21 PM.
Another SEE who comes between the marriage of a man only to walk away from the relationship because it was unsatisfying
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
mb ISFP
If you'll type more correctly you'll notice that socionics functions descriptions are correct.
When you type badly you'll not notice this, evidently, as people will behave differently than you expect according to the theory. The problem is not in the theory and most people find it good, while you have nothing against the theory except your lame typing experience. In my experience the classic theory is good, for example.
Instead of persisting in your exotic bs about functions, assume you typed people wrongly and what you see is just behavior related of other functions.
You use same terms, but they have other meaning than in Socionics. For example, you said that your Fi is not associated with "liking", what contradicts to basics of Socionics. Similarly may to be with any term you are using.
Last edited by Sol; 07-12-2016 at 04:31 PM.
SEE-Se
I think she is a clear SEE. Fun and spontaneous, loud and impulsive, prone to saying raunchy/provocative/shocking things, gets impatient when people start asking too many questions that don't have a clear point or cross over personal boundaries. Good to see that people mostly agree on this one. Her role in the Hunger Games was very Gamma too. It's funny, people often don't play completely different types in their roles, more often they play a "different version" of their own type. Katniss might be seen as a more serious kind of SEE. Her character in Silver Linings Playbook is basically her real personality though.
I'll give you credit as the first person I've seen say that LSI could be "over the top" and engage in antics because of Se creative and Fe seeking. The reason for the credit is that it's at least not the usual stereotype of LSI as a robotic soldier of a person.
That said, I know a fair number of people I type LSI and can't say any of them are over-the-top, and their antics are pretty darned limited. The Se is happening within a rational framework, which keeps it from looking extreme, bouncy, over-the-top. The antics, if any, are mostly verbal and not really all that amusing. It's rather the sad lack of talent with antics that I find endearing.
Notwithstanding her personality in movie roles (which I do think is type-related, but I interpret it differently) - why would a type with Suggestive Fe and Creative Se be more inclined to "antics" or less subdued than a type with Leading Se and Demonstrative Fe? That doesn't make any sense to me.
IEI-Fe
ahhhhhh true! THAT'S why I like her! I originally saw an mbti typing thing telling she is definitely EIE and I was later on wondering why do I like her then! I get it now. SEE it is.
Estp I think
I picked SEE. Even tho I see so many similarities between me and her, mannerisms, cracking jokes, chill, slightly ditsy.
LSI-Se 836 Sp/Sx
I think ESE, I saw few SEE girls and she's nothing like them. And I can easily put her in the Alpha quadra from how silly she acts and all.
From my observations of SEE, they never ever act silly.... they're serious as heck even if they are smiling, joking...
Jennifer I think is Fe ego.
How she mimics other people and you see when she talks about her past experiences, she talks about them in a way like she's now experiencing them again with all the emotions she felt back then, and you can't stop listening and she tries her best to make people relate to her ( That's why she's likable i think).
I don't see SEEs like this at all.
Gamma SF are different, go see a video of Angelina jolie (SEE or ESI not sure) and you will see the difference.
They're more reserved, seems a bit distant, they don't show emotions much and ofcourse NOT SILLY.
I think she's Fe ego, and extroverted, so it's between ESE and EIE. But I say ESE tho because how silly she acts (Ne i guess), EIEs are seen as serious and arrogant (when that's not true I guess).
Some strong creative in this one.
I advocate IEE more than SEE because of the absurd ideas, the interjections, sudden maverick thoughts, and this relaxation/tiredness thing, but it has to be one of both. Can't see another possibility. could be the slight provocations or aggressive intonations but really it could also be the unconventionality of and strength of which seems like it's just imitating others. Remember, she's an actress.
ESE is not like her, contrast Kelly Ripa to the impulsive and strongly oscillating Ep antics, extremely different.
Some slight bit with looking up things came up as well. demonstrative is of course strong but it comes in bursts, high inconsistency ( PoLR).
Trivia: Paul Rudd (SLI) seems very important to Jennifer here, could be a sign or not.
I would not say no for IEE. Very real possibility. She is not disgracing (BTW: those people should be tickled). I think she makes fun of for real.
Where's da force?
In Gulenko terms she displays + not -. Could be bit "aggressive" language here and there but not real assertions what SEE will try play out.
Show me (- BTW) SEE who starts to think sex without gravity on interview.
Last edited by The Reality Denialist; 07-01-2017 at 04:06 PM.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
I've seen her typed as EIE plenty of times but I really don't think she's Beta, so I'd go with ESE
She is not Fe leading my god. SEE af
Edit: lmao, I thought we're talking about Amy Schumer. Still, Jennifer SEE>IEE.
deleted
Last edited by Zero11; 11-20-2017 at 08:22 PM.