Alright, I'm bored. It's been a while. That's right, it's this thread again. Let's do this.
LII
ILE
ESE
SEI
IEI
EIE
SLE
LSI
SEE
ILI
LIE
ESI
LSE
EII
IEE
SLI
Alright, I'm bored. It's been a while. That's right, it's this thread again. Let's do this.
Last edited by Capitalist Pig; 03-24-2012 at 02:13 AM.
hurry now for your chance to get in on the ground floor of a legendary thread!!!!!!!!
ps. first post in a legendary thread!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111111111
LSE
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp![]()
DCNH: Dominant![]()
--> perhaps Normalizing
![]()
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
Looks still ILI to me.
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
SLI
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
@Capitalist Pig, I was googling "the16types peter dinklage", and after changing to image search I found several pictures of the same guy that caught my attention. I selected one of them, went to te corresponding page, and I found myself here. I guess muneroni's post was the cause of this.
Interesting that some users said you V.I. as delta, as some pople did the same about me in my type-me thread (still I think you're an ILI and I have my type unfixed). Another coincidence: Korp mentioned what he described as noticeable orbital ridges, and the same happens to me. But I do not know if this qualifier is appropiate, because afaik such concept refers to noticeable curvature in the craneal bone above the eyes.
The same way as me, your forehead is still mainly flat and more or less in paralell with the face, even if it goes "outside". People with strict supraorbital arcs tend to have a sort of curved backwards forehead (although not always), and the bone portion above eyes is protruding, which is not the case.
There are some people here who have studied Biology. Maybe someone could confirm if this still fits under the same concept or it's a different fenotype caused by different genes. I'm curious.
@Kim?
Last edited by MensSuperMateriam; 09-06-2014 at 02:13 PM.