You can view the page at http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...and-Punishment
You can view the page at http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...and-Punishment
This shows you understand very little about the real system socionics intends to model.
You should at least have the guts to let DarkAngelFireWolf69 review your work. Or maybe Boukalov's wife.
LII-Ne
"Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!"
- Blair Houghton
Johari
I don't think any of the user generated content on this site is finished enough to present outside of this forum. As noted, this is in progress. The key to spreading the information is to give it rigorous editing, research and documentation process and gather that information into a suitable format for presentation.
I agree with tcaud, this is obviously speculation and therefore belongs in the section for Socionics related hypotheses.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Note this is under viewpoints in the CMS, hypothesis in the CMS is different than hypothesis on the forum.
Hypothesis is actually a level of content of higher grade than Viewpoints and include as of now only outside content.
Viewpoints is for user generated content that is socionics and model A oriented. Hypothesis Forum(not cms) is for anything that seeks to go outside of socionics like supersocion, model X/B etc.
I've renamed the hypothesis forum to be Alternate Model and New Theories to clarify the confusion.
Aligning socionics with another separate theory of psychology sounds like a hypothesis to me. Why split hairs? Don't want to rub shoulders with tcaud? It's where I post my theories on quadra progression, which are Model A based.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Now it doesn't have to go there. That is the point, to highlight Model A developments for people interested in Model A. The article you wrote would fit into the viewpoints area and not alternate model/theory. Viewpoints is also hypothesis. This section didn't exist until I made the CMS and now exists in the forum as well.
One of my goals with the forum is to promote Socionics and Model A by making the associating with other branches of psychology which I've investigated in order to make this study accessible to general psychology as a whole. I invite others to do so as well. You might not agree with that, but that is a direction that is being taken.