What type do you think I am?
What type do you think I am?
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
Judging from your name, Alpha or Beta; maybe LII, LSI, or SLI![]()
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I thought Ti is knowledge, not necessarily truth
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
SLI! we are thinking similarly here again![]()
Delta NF and I confirm that.
There is no clear limit, but I would call Ti = understanding; Te = knowledge.
Anyway, Ti is structural or logical consistency, so in a way it is truth but it is not absolute - people make errors, can be misguided or can be simply wrong, even if consistent. Factual truth, on the other hand, is empirical, it can't be primarily related a Fields (Introverted) function.
Well well well. Shit just hit the fan.
What Ineffable says seems to be how socionics understands it. From the standpoint of I/E semantics, things do end up seeming muddied and contradictory.
In a general sense, in my opinion, the sense of Ti in a Te type is one that is updated much more frequently than with a Ti type and more adaptable; the sense of Te in a Ti type is one that is also much more updated frequently than with a Te type and is more adaptable.
The more important aspect between the two then might be one of motivation, since the Ti type is looking to gain an all-encompassing containing idea to a body of knowledge, whereas the Te type is concerned more with understanding as many containers as possible in order that they may be used to adapt other things. Logic by itself is primarily an associative container for how we can come to understand things, so I believe this is a better distinction in explaining things. But I'm open to better alternatives.
“I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in — and the West in general — into an unbearable hell and a choking life. - Osama bin Laden
Very convinced you're LII. Just about the first thing you did when you came here was post a system of six dichotomies you made/found/organized, which indicates heavy Ti valuing. Alpha's more likely than Beta. Introtim's more likely than Extrotim. When I look at your writing, it falls in line well with the other LIIs, there's an internal push-pull to it that I want to liken to, if not Holographical-Panoramic cognition, then at least Negativism...
There's the issue with the name Truth as well.
That word very often comes from Merry types from a certain angle in a really charged manner. In short, Ti over Te, with the Fe on the other side of Ti and diametrically opposed to Te, providing the "charge".
I should really make more videos, talking is easier than writing![]()
![]()
p . . . a . . . n . . . d . . . o . . . r . . . a
trad metalz | (more coming)
Well, you are welcome to interpret that quote in any way you want. However, it basically entails that I am relaying the ideas that I only feel comfortable doing so by being anonymous, which is why I have revealed little about myself. I am a new forum member though that has been lurking for quite some time.
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
okay, i don't have any reason not to believe you. it wasn't a big deal to me anyway.
your threads so far? what comes to mind: categorization, social dynamics, coherency. Ti/Fe, Ti ego? aristocrat? LSI? lol this is a ridiculous stretch. i think i for one at least need more to work with.