Quote Originally Posted by soundofconfusion View Post
the reason why I'm quoting DarkAngelFireWolf69 so often is because people often respond to me with their subjective opinion on socionics which often isn't in line with the theory at all. you are free to have your own view, but it's just surprising to me that my knowledge is "stereotypical" when it's literally a definition of another researcher, and I don't see why it's a bad thing. view it as having "no opinion of your own", whatever. you can type people on your own defintions of functions but that won't help you very much in my opinion.
Again, I'm not arbitrarily employing some ad hoc description I find palatable. I briefly characterized Si as "processing subjective sense impressions of the environment on an ongoing basis," which I hope you can see relating to "external dynamics of fields"; and pointed out how that kind of information processing pattern could have extrapolations into the realm you were describing. But ultimately, if you literally think Si is just physical comfort and sensory pleasure or whatever, there's no point in discussing it