Quote Originally Posted by Ryan View Post
ESC is claiming that Ti is always paired with Se, for some reason, and that Se describes facts as well. He is using both of these hypotheses to prove that Ti can include facts in its definition as well. I don't understand where he is going with that either.
I wasn't claiming that. I'm saying responding to Shrimp's post " I probably automatically associated it(Ti) with Se" in trying to describe the difference between Te and Ti.

It's not the first time you tried to speak for others. If you're going to do it at least keep me out of it because it only misrepresents people's positions and causes more problems.