
Originally Posted by
Absurd
You can stretch it to Ti but Se is still there. What you did there, is you presented two functions in tandem. Not one, not three and not four. Two. Mass going by those funny definitions you posted isn't Ti as in the domain of Ti. Se it is. Mass is not and never was "Perception of an object's position in space". Mass falls under "Perception of the appearance and shape of an object."
As long we're not talking chemistry, that is.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/mass
- a body of coherent matter, usually of indefinite shape and often of considerable size: a mass of dough.
- a collection of incoherent particles, parts, or objects regarded as forming one body: a mass of sand.
- aggregate; whole (usually preceded by in the ): People, in the mass, mean well.
- a considerable assemblage, number, or quantity: a mass of errors; a mass of troops.
- bulk, size, expanse, or massiveness: towers of great mass and strength.

- Perception of the appearance and shape of an object

- Perception of an object's position in space
Mass is dependent upon dimensions & content, it is separably both
and
. The appearance and form of an object cannot exist without its structure & composition and structure & composition only exist within the object they form.
Like I said, I don't support these analyses and won't entertain them for long. It's basically meaningless.