lsdfhdshvs;akdjvndjskvn;akjsdnvd;skjvkjdfvbjkafdnv bda
lsdfhdshvs;akdjvndjskvn;akjsdnvd;skjvkjdfvbjkafdnv bda
uuum...hmmm...def ISTX
ur LSE stfu
(but really, LSI? No)
I think ESE-Si is right.
IxTx type? Forget it...
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
i really like this EIE guy right now so i'm going to switch my type to LSI too.
YaY dualitY no matter what tYpe You are!
maybe a saint is just a dead prick with a good publicist
maybe tommorow's statues are insecure without their foes
go ask the frog what the scorpion knows
huh.
Interesting. That was my V.I. typing of you a while ago. Not saying that proves anything, but it's interesting.
Quaero Veritas.
"You're so Intuitive Irrational. Such a pity you've joined the dark side," said the obvious LSI.![]()
Quaero Veritas.
Krig, you don't mind I ask you a very important question?
Krig, we are both either Irrational (IMO) or Rational (IYO). We could work together to find a common framework, even if partial, ours are currently upside-down relative to one another in certain aspects, primarily the understanding of Ne and Ni and apparently some others, like J/P. That is unacceptable. But because our apparently irreconciliable positions, we could use some mediators, I propose Azeroffs and Pa3s, what do you think? I picked them because the seem to talk your language, at the same time their knowledge being in agreement with mine in these sensitive aspects I was talking about.
I see another possibly good solution, to talk one-on-one (PM or something); in my experience it happens to agree with ILI () much more when we talk individually than in a social context. I just don't have that much time and patience, discussions with ILIs are looong and tedious.
Who do you think I'm trying to fool? I just outed myself! Dumb bitch.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...